Home
Class 12
CHEMISTRY
When ethyl acetate was hydrolyzed in the...

When ethyl acetate was hydrolyzed in the presence of `0.1 M HCl`, the constant was found to be `5.40 xx 10^(-5) s^(-1)`. But when `0.1 M H_(2)SO_(4)` was used for hydrolyiss, the rate constant found to be `6.20 xx 10^(-5) s^(-1)`. form these we can say that

A

`H_(2)SO_(4)` is stronger than `HCl`

B

`H_(2)SO_(4)` and `HCl` are both of the same stength of `HCl`

C

`H_(2)SO_(4)` is weaker than `HCl`.

D

The data is insufficient to compare the strength of `HCl` and `H_(2)SO_(4)`.

Text Solution

Verified by Experts

The correct Answer is:
A

Since `k_(H_(2)SO_(4)) gt k_(HCl)`, hence `H_(2)SO_(4)` is stronger acid than `HCl`.
Doubtnut Promotions Banner Mobile Dark
|

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • CHEMICAL KINETICS

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Exercises Assertion-Reasoning|22 Videos
  • CHEMICAL KINETICS

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Exercises Integer|15 Videos
  • CHEMICAL KINETICS

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Exercises Multiple Correct|34 Videos
  • CARBOXYLIC ACIDS AND THEIR DERIVATIVES

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Exercises Archives (Analytical And Descriptive)|34 Videos
  • COORDINATION COMPOUNDS

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Archives Subjective|18 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

When ethyl acetate was hydrolysed in pressure of 0.1 N HCI, the rate constant was found to be 5.40 xx 10^(-5) sec^(-1) . But when 0.1 N H_2SO_4 was used for hydrolysis, the rate constant was found to be 6.25 xx10^(-5)sec^(-1). Thus, it may be concluded that :

In the reaction, A to B , the value of the rate constant was found to be 1.0 xx 10^(-2) mol^(-1) L s^(-1) . What is the order of the reaction? How will the catalyst affect of the value of the rate constant?

Knowledge Check

  • When ethyl acetate was hydrolysed in presence of 0.1 N HCl, the rate constant was found to be 5.40 xx 10^(-5)s^(-1) , But when 0.1 NH_2SO_4 was used for the hydrolysis, the rate constant was found to be 6.20 xx 10^(-5)s^(-1) . From these values we can say that

    A
    `H_2SO_4` is stronger than HCl
    B
    `H_2SO_4` is weaker than HCI
    C
    both the acids have equal strength
    D
    the data is insufficient to compare the strengths of HCl and `H_2SO_4`
  • When ethyl acetate was hydrolysed in presence of 0.1 N HCl, the rate constant was found to be 5.40xx10^(-5)s^(-1) . But when 0.1" N H"_(2)SO_(4) was used for the hydrolysis, the rate constant was found to be 6.20xx10^(-5)s^(-1) . From these values we can say that

    A
    `H_(2)SO_(4)` is stronger than HCl
    B
    `H_(2)SO_(4)` is weaker than HCl
    C
    Both the acids have equal strength
    D
    The data is insufficient to compare the strengths of HCl and `H_(2)SO_(4)`.
  • When ethyl acetate was was hydrolysedin presemce of 0.1 M HCl, the rate constant was found to be 5.4xx10^(-5)s^(-1) . But in presence of 0.1 M H_(2)SO_(4) the rate constant was found to be 6.25xx10^(-5)s^(-1) . Thus it may be concluded that:

    A
    `H_(2)SO_(4)` furnishes more `H^(+)` than HCl
    B
    `H_(2)SO_(4)` furnishes less `H^(+)` than HCl
    C
    both have the same strength
    D
    will depend on concentration of ethyl acetate
  • Similar Questions

    Explore conceptually related problems

    A first order reaction is found to have a rate constant k= 5.5 xx 10^(-14)s^(-1) . Find half-life of the reaction.

    The rate of a first order reaction. A rarrB is 5.4xx10^(-6)Ms^(-1) when [A] is 0.3 M. Calculate the rate constant of the reaction

    A first order reaction is found to have a rate constant, k=7.39 xx 10^(-5)s^(-1) . Find the half life of the reaction.

    The rate constant for the hydrolyiss of ethyl acetate in the presence of 0.1 N acid (A) was found to be 5.4 xx 10^(5) s^(-1) and for the hydrolyiss of ethyl acetate in the presence of 0.1 N acid (B) , it was 6.2 xx 10^(-5) s^(-1) . form these observations, one may conclude that

    Hydrolysis of amyl acetate was carried out separately in the presence of 0.02 M HCl and 0.02 M H_(2)SO_(4) The rate constants were found to be k_(1) and k_(2) then