Home
Class 12
CHEMISTRY
Bond dissociation energy of F(2) is less...

Bond dissociation energy of `F_(2)` is less that of `Cl_(2)` give reason.

Text Solution

Verified by Experts

Atomic size of `F` atom is less than `Cl` ,hence bond length `F-F` is less than `Cl-Cl`. Thus the `lp-lp` repulsion in `F-F` molecule is much larger than `Cl-Cl` molecules . Hence `F-F` bond is weaker than `Cl-Cl` bond dissociation energy of `F_(2)` is less than that of `Cl_(2)`.
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • P-BLOCK GROUP 17 ELEMENTS - THE HALOGEN FAMILY

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Exs 4.1 (Objective)|7 Videos
  • P-BLOCK GROUP 17 ELEMENTS - THE HALOGEN FAMILY

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Exercises (Linked Comprehension)|26 Videos
  • P-BLOCK GROUP 17 ELEMENTS - THE HALOGEN FAMILY

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Solved Example|7 Videos
  • P-BLOCK GROUP 16 ELEMENTS - THE OXYGEN FAMILY

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Archives Subjective|10 Videos
  • P-BLOCK GROUP 18 ELEMENTS - THE INERT GASES

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Ex 5.1 (Objective)|14 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Assertion: Bond dissociation energy of F_(2) molecule is less than that of Cl_(2) molecule. Reason: Due to inter-electronic repulsion between F atom, F-F bond length in F_(2) molecule is higher than Cl-Cl bond lengthh in Cl_(2) molecule.

Given reasons in two or three sentences only for (i) Bond dissociation energy of F_(2) is less than that of CI_(2) . (ii) Sulphur dioxide is a more powerful reducing agent in the alkaline medium than in acidic medium.

The bond dissociation energy of N_(2)^(+) is less than that of N_(2) . Show why this is the case.

Statement-1 : Bond dissociation energy of F_(2) is more than Cl_(2) . Statement-2 : Due to smaller size of fluorine there are greater electron repulsions between the F atoms than Cl atoms.

The bond dissociation energy of F_(2) ,is very low due to

Assertion :- Bond Dissociation energy is F_(2) gt Cl_(2) Reason:- Cl_(2) have more electronic repulsion than F_(2) .