Home
Class 12
CHEMISTRY
Consider the following sets of quantum n...

Consider the following sets of quantum numbers.
(i) `{:(n,l,m,s,),(3,0,0,+1//2,):}`
(ii) `{:(n,l,m,s,),(2,2,1,+1//2,):}`
(iii) `{:(n,l,m,s,),(4,3,-2,-1//2,):}`
(iv) `{:(n,l,m,s,),(1,0,-1,-1//2,):}`
(v) `{:(n,l,m,s,),(3,2,3,+1//2,):}`
Which of the following sets of quantum number is not possible ?

A

(ii), (iii) and (iv)

B

(i), (ii), (iii) and (iv)

C

(ii), (iv) and (v)

D

(i) and (iii)

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To determine which sets of quantum numbers are not possible, we need to apply the rules governing quantum numbers: 1. **Principal Quantum Number (n)**: This can take any positive integer value (1, 2, 3, ...). 2. **Azimuthal Quantum Number (l)**: This can take integer values from 0 to (n-1). 3. **Magnetic Quantum Number (m)**: This can take integer values from -l to +l, including 0. 4. **Spin Quantum Number (s)**: This can take values of +1/2 or -1/2. Now, let's analyze each set of quantum numbers provided in the question: ### Set (i): (n, l, m, s) = (3, 0, 0, +1/2) - **n = 3**: Valid, as n is a positive integer. - **l = 0**: Valid, since l can be from 0 to (3-1). - **m = 0**: Valid, since m can be from -0 to +0 (only 0). - **s = +1/2**: Valid, as s can be +1/2 or -1/2. **Conclusion**: This set is valid. ### Set (ii): (n, l, m, s) = (2, 2, 1, +1/2) - **n = 2**: Valid. - **l = 2**: Invalid, since l must be in the range 0 to (2-1) = 1. - **m = 1**: Not checked, as l is already invalid. - **s = +1/2**: Not checked, as l is already invalid. **Conclusion**: This set is invalid. ### Set (iii): (n, l, m, s) = (4, 3, -2, -1/2) - **n = 4**: Valid. - **l = 3**: Valid, since l can be from 0 to (4-1). - **m = -2**: Valid, since m can range from -3 to +3 (l = 3). - **s = -1/2**: Valid. **Conclusion**: This set is valid. ### Set (iv): (n, l, m, s) = (1, 0, -1, -1/2) - **n = 1**: Valid. - **l = 0**: Valid. - **m = -1**: Invalid, since m must be in the range -0 to +0 (only 0). - **s = -1/2**: Not checked, as m is already invalid. **Conclusion**: This set is invalid. ### Set (v): (n, l, m, s) = (3, 2, 3, +1/2) - **n = 3**: Valid. - **l = 2**: Valid. - **m = 3**: Invalid, since m must be in the range -2 to +2 (l = 2). - **s = +1/2**: Not checked, as m is already invalid. **Conclusion**: This set is invalid. ### Summary of Validity: - Set (i): Valid - Set (ii): Invalid - Set (iii): Valid - Set (iv): Invalid - Set (v): Invalid ### Final Answer: The sets of quantum numbers that are not possible are (ii), (iv), and (v).

To determine which sets of quantum numbers are not possible, we need to apply the rules governing quantum numbers: 1. **Principal Quantum Number (n)**: This can take any positive integer value (1, 2, 3, ...). 2. **Azimuthal Quantum Number (l)**: This can take integer values from 0 to (n-1). 3. **Magnetic Quantum Number (m)**: This can take integer values from -l to +l, including 0. 4. **Spin Quantum Number (s)**: This can take values of +1/2 or -1/2. Now, let's analyze each set of quantum numbers provided in the question: ...
Doubtnut Promotions Banner Mobile Dark
|

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Which of the following sets of quantum numbers are correct? n l m n l m

The set of quantum numbers, n = 3, l = 2, m_(l) = 0

The set of quantum numbers, n = 2, l = 2, m_(l) = 0 :

Designate the electrons with the following sets of quantum numbers : (a) n=3, l=0, m=0, s=-1/2 (b) n=2, l=1, m=+1, s=+1/2 (c ) n=5, l=0, m=0, s=+1/2

Which of the following sets of quantum numbers do not belong to 2p subshell? (i) n=2, l=1, m=+1, s=+1/2 (ii) n=2, l=0, m=0, s=-1/2 (iii) n=1, l=1, m=0, s=+1/2

Designate the electrons having the following sets of quantum numbers, (a) n=2, l=0, m =0, s=+1/2 (b) n=3, l=1, m=+1, s=+1/2 (c ) n=l, l=0, m=0, s=-1/2

From the following sets of quantum numbers , state which are possible ? (i) n=0,l=0,m_(l)=1,m_(s)= +1//2 (ii) n=2,l=1,m_(l)=0,m_(s) = -1//2 (iii) n=2, l=0,m_(1)=3,m_(s) = +1//2 (iv) n=3,l=1,m_(l)=0,m_(s) = +1//2

Which of the following sets of quantum numbers represent an impossible arrangement :- {:(,n,l,m,m_(s),),((A),3,2,-2,(1)/(2),),((B),4,0,0,(1)/(2),),((C),3,2,-3,(1)/(2),),((D),5,3,0,(1)/(2),):}

Which of the following sets of quantum numbers are impossible for electrons? Explain why in each case. |{:("Set",n,l,m,s),((i),1,0,1,+1/2),((ii),3,0,0,-1/2),((iii),1,2,2,+1/2),((iv),4,3,-3,+1/2),((v),5,2,1,-1/2),((vi),3,2,1,0):}|

Which of the following sets of quantum number is INCORRECT? (I) n=3, l = 4, m=0, s=+(1)/(2) (II) n=3, l = 3, m = +3, s=+(1)/(2) (III) n=6, l = 0, m=+1, s=-(1)/(2) (IV) n=4, l = 2, m = +2, s=0