Home
Class 12
CHEMISTRY
Assertion: Aquated copper(I) cation unde...

Assertion: Aquated copper(I) cation undergoes disproportionation as:
`2Cu^(+)(aq) to Cu^(2+)(aq)+Cu`
Reason: Hydration energy of `Cu^(2+)` is higher than that of `Cu^(+)` which compensates second ionisation energy of Cu.

A

If both assertion and reason are true and the reason is the correct explanation of assertion

B

If both assertion and reason are true and the reason is not the correct explanation of assertion

C

If assertion is false but reason is true

D

If assertion is true but the reason is false

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To solve the question, we need to analyze both the assertion and the reason provided regarding the behavior of the aquated copper(I) cation. ### Step-by-Step Solution: 1. **Understanding Disproportionation Reaction**: - Disproportionation is a type of redox reaction where a single species is both oxidized and reduced. In this case, the assertion states that the aquated copper(I) cation (Cu⁺) undergoes disproportionation: \[ 2Cu^{+}(aq) \rightarrow Cu^{2+}(aq) + Cu(s) \] - Here, one Cu⁺ ion is oxidized to Cu²⁺ (losing an electron), while another Cu⁺ ion is reduced to metallic copper (Cu) (gaining an electron). 2. **Analyzing the Reason**: - The reason states that the hydration energy of Cu²⁺ is higher than that of Cu⁺, which compensates for the second ionization energy of copper. - Hydration energy refers to the energy released when ions are surrounded by water molecules. Cu²⁺, having a higher charge density due to its +2 charge, interacts more strongly with water molecules compared to Cu⁺, leading to greater hydration energy. 3. **Comparing Ionization Energies**: - The second ionization energy of copper (removing an electron from Cu⁺ to form Cu²⁺) is significant. However, the high hydration energy of Cu²⁺ can offset this energy requirement. - When Cu⁺ loses an electron to become Cu²⁺, the energy released from hydration compensates for the energy needed to remove that electron. 4. **Conclusion**: - Both the assertion and the reason are true. The assertion correctly describes the disproportionation reaction of Cu⁺, and the reason accurately explains why this reaction occurs based on the hydration energies and ionization energies involved. - Therefore, the correct answer is that both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion. ### Final Answer: Both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.
Doubtnut Promotions Banner Mobile Dark
|

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • d-BLOCK ELEMENTS

    VK JAISWAL ENGLISH|Exercise Level 2|154 Videos
  • CO-ORDINATION COMPOUNDS

    VK JAISWAL ENGLISH|Exercise LEVEL 2|144 Videos
  • ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY

    VK JAISWAL ENGLISH|Exercise ASSERTION-REASON TYPE QUESTIONS|14 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Why Cr and Cu have abnormally higher 2nd ionisation energy

The unique behaviour of CU, having a positive E^(@) (reduction potential) accounts for its inability to liberate H_(2) from acids,. Only oxidising acids (nitric acid and hot concentrated sulphuric acid) react with Cu. The high energy of transform Cu(s) to Cu^(2+)(aq.) is not balanced by its hydration enthalpy. On the other hand, All Cu(II) halides are known except iodide. in this case, Cu^(2+) oxidises I^(-) to I_(2) : 2Cu^(2+)+4I^(-) to 2CuI(s)+I_(2) However, copper (I) compounds are unstable in aqueous solution annd undergo disproportionation. 2Cu^(+)(aq.)toCu^(2+)(aq.)+Cu The stability of Cu^(2+)(aq.) rather than Cu^(+)(aq) is due to the much more negative Delta_(Hyd) of Cu^(2+)(aq.) than Cu^(+)(aq.) Q. Select the correct chemical change:

Knowledge Check

  • Assertion (A) Cu (II) iodide is not known. Reason (R ) Cu^(2+) oxidises I^(-) to iodine.

    A
    If both assertion and reason are true and reason is the correct explanation of assertion.
    B
    If both assertion and reason are true and reason not is the correct explanation of assertion.
    C
    If assertion is trun but reason is false.
    D
    If both assertion and reason are false.
  • Assertion : Copper is unable to displace H_2 form dil. H_2 SO_4 Reason : The standard electrode potential for Cu^(2+)//Cu system is greater than that of H^+//1/2 H_2 system.

    A
    If both Assertion and Reason are CORRECT and Reason is the CORRECT explanation of the Assertion.
    B
    If both Assertion and Reason are CORRECT but Reason is not the CORRECT explanation of the Assertion.
    C
    If Assertion is CORRECT but Reason is INCORRECT.
    D
    If Assertion is INCORRECT but Reason is CORRECT.
  • Similar Questions

    Explore conceptually related problems

    The unique behaviour of CU, having a positive E^(@) (reduction potential) accounts for its inability to liberate H_(2) from acids,. Only oxidising acids (nitric acid and hot concentrated sulphuric acid) react with Cu. The high energy of transform Cu(s) to Cu^(2+)(aq.) is not balanced by its hydration enthalpy. On the other hand, All Cu(II) halides are known except iodide. in this case, Cu^(2+) oxidises I^(-) to I_(2) : 2Cu^(2+)+4I^(-) to 2CuI(s)+I_(2) However, copper (I) compounds are unstable in aqueous solution annd undergo disproportionation. 2Cu^(+)(aq.)toCu^(2+)(aq.)+Cu The stability of Cu^(2+)(aq.) rather than Cu^(+)(aq) is due to the much more negative Delta_(Hyd) of Cu^(2+)(aq.) than Cu^(+)(aq.) Q. Consider the following transformation: CuSO_(4)(aq.)+KI(excess)to product Select the correct statement:

    Find the number of electrons transferred in the equation Cu(g) + 2Ag^+(aq) → Cu^(2+)(aq) + 2Ag(s) .

    For the disproportion of copper: 2 Cu^(+) to Cu^(+2) + Cu E^(0) is :- Given E^(0) for Cu^(+2)//Cu is 0.34 V & E^(0) for Cu^(+2)//Cu^(+) is 0.15 V:

    Write Nernst equation for the following cell reaction : Zn"|"Zn^(2+)(aq)"||"Cu^(2+)(aq)"|"Cu(s)

    Assertion (A) Cu^(2+) iodide is not known. Reason (R ) Cu^(2+) oxidises I^(-) to iodine.

    In Cu-ammonia complex the state of hybridization of Cu^(+2) is