Home
Class 12
CHEMISTRY
Assertion: Ionisation potential of Be (a...

Assertion: Ionisation potential of `Be` (atomic no.4) is less than `B` (atomic no.5).
Reason: The first electron released from `Be` is of p-orbital but that from `B` is of s-orbital.

A

If both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.

B

If both A and R are true but R is not the correct explanation of A.

C

If A is true but R is false

D

If A is false but R is true.

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To solve the question, we need to analyze both the assertion and the reason provided. **Step 1: Understand the assertion.** The assertion states that the ionization potential of beryllium (Be) is less than that of boron (B). - Beryllium (atomic number 4) has the electronic configuration: 1s² 2s². - Boron (atomic number 5) has the electronic configuration: 1s² 2s² 2p¹. **Step 2: Understand the concept of ionization potential.** Ionization potential (or ionization energy) is the energy required to remove an electron from an atom in its gaseous state. Generally, the more stable an electron configuration is (like a filled or half-filled subshell), the higher the ionization potential. **Step 3: Analyze the electronic configurations.** - In beryllium, the outermost shell (n=2) is fully filled with 2 electrons in the 2s orbital. - In boron, the outermost shell has 2 electrons in the 2s orbital and 1 electron in the 2p orbital. **Step 4: Compare the stability of the configurations.** - Beryllium's configuration is stable due to the fully filled 2s orbital. - Boron's configuration is less stable because it has an unpaired electron in the 2p orbital, making it more likely to lose that electron to achieve a stable configuration similar to beryllium. **Step 5: Conclusion about the assertion.** Since boron has an unpaired electron and is more likely to lose it, it will have a lower ionization potential compared to beryllium. Thus, the assertion is true. **Step 6: Understand the reason.** The reason states that the first electron released from beryllium is from a p-orbital, while that from boron is from an s-orbital. - In reality, the first electron removed from beryllium is from the 2s orbital (not p), and the first electron removed from boron is from the 2p orbital. **Step 7: Conclusion about the reason.** Since the reason is incorrect (the assertion about the orbitals is wrong), we conclude that the reason is false. **Final Conclusion:** - The assertion is true: Ionization potential of Be is less than that of B. - The reason is false: The first electron released from Be is from the s-orbital, not the p-orbital. Thus, the correct answer is that the assertion is true and the reason is false.

To solve the question, we need to analyze both the assertion and the reason provided. **Step 1: Understand the assertion.** The assertion states that the ionization potential of beryllium (Be) is less than that of boron (B). - Beryllium (atomic number 4) has the electronic configuration: 1s² 2s². - Boron (atomic number 5) has the electronic configuration: 1s² 2s² 2p¹. ...
Doubtnut Promotions Banner Mobile Dark
|

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Assertion (A) : Ionisation potential of Be (atomic number 4 ) is more than B (atomic number 5) Reason (R ) : The first electron released fromm Be is of p orbitals but that from B is of s orbitals.

In H atom when electron jumps from 1s to 2s orbital,

Assertion: The first ionisation energy of Be is greater than that of B . Reason: 2p-orbital is lower in energy than 2s-orbital.

Assertion: The first ionisation energy of Be is greater than that of B . Reason: 2p-orbital is lower in energy than 2s-orbital.

Assertion: ionisation energy of sulphur is less than that of phosphorus. Reason: Half filled p-orbitals have extra stability.

If an electron drops from 4th orbit to 2nd orbit in an H-atom, then

Minimum excitation potential of Bohr's first orbit hydrogen atom is

Assertion: The first ionization energy of Be is greater than that of B. Reason: 2p-orbital is lower in energy than 2s-orbital.

Assertion: The first ionization energy of Be is greater than that of B. Reason: 2p-orbital is lowerr in energy than 2s-orbital.

Assertion (A) : IE_(1) of Mg is greater than that of Al . Reason (R ) : It is easier to remove an electron fro 3s orbital than from 3p orbital.