Home
Class 12
PHYSICS
Prove that electromagnetic waves are tra...

Prove that electromagnetic waves are transverse in nature.

Text Solution

Verified by Experts

Consider an electromagnetic wave propagating along x-axis. Since parallelopiped OABCDEFG does not enclose any charge. Therefore from Gauss.s law
`oint vec(E ).vec(dS) = 0 or underset(ABCD)int vec(E ).vec(dS) + underset(OEFG)int vec(E ).vec(dS) + underset(BCFG)int vec(E ).vec(dS) + underset(OADE)int vec(E ).vec(dS) + underset(CDEF)int vec(E ).vec(dS) + underset(OABG)int vec(E ).vec(dS)= 0` ...(i)
`vec(E )` does not depend upon y and z. So, electric flux from surface BCFG and OEDA will be equal and opposite.
Hence, `underset(BCFG)int vec(E ).vec(dS) + underset(OADE)int vec(E ).vec(dS)= 0` ...(ii)
Similarly `underset(CDEF)int vec(E ).vec(dS) + underset(OABG)vec(E ).vec(dS) = 0` ...(iii)
Using equation (ii) and (iii), equation (i) becomes

`underset(ABCD)int vec(E).vec(dS) + underset(OEFG)int vec(E ).vec(dS)= 0`
`underset(ABCD)int E_(x) ds cos 0^(@) + underset(OERG)int E_(x) dS cos 180^(@)= 0`
Where `E_(x) and E._(x)` are the value of electric field at faces ABCD and OEFG. or `E_(x) underset(ABCD)int dS- E._(x) underset(OEFG)int dS= 0`
If S is the area of ABCD and OEFG, then `E_(x) S- E._(x) S= 0 or (E_(x)- E._(x))S= 0`
As S cannot be zero, therefore either `E_(x)- E._(x)= 0` i.e., `E_(x)= E._(x) or E_(x)= E._(x)= 0`
`E_(x)= E._(x)` implies that electric field is static. Static field cannot propagate as a wave. Hence `E_(x) ne E._(x)` then `E_(x)= E._(x)= 0` i.e., field along x-axis is zero. It means that field is perpendicular to x-axis. Similarly, we can show that the magnetic field has no component along x-axis (direction of propagation of wave). Since both electric and magnetic fields are perpendicular to the direction of propagation. Therefore, electromagnetic waves are transverse in nature.
Promotional Banner

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

What are electromagnetic waves?

Can electromagnetic waves be polarised?