Home
Class 12
CHEMISTRY
Assertion :- Bond Dissociation energy is...

Assertion :- Bond Dissociation energy is `F_(2) gt Cl_(2)`
Reason:- `Cl_(2)` have more electronic repulsion than `F_(2)`.

A

If both Assertion & Reason are True & the Reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion.

B

If both Assertion & Reason are True but Reason is not a correct explanation of the Assertion.

C

If Assertion is True, but the Reason is False.

D

If both Assertion & Reason are false

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To analyze the assertion and reason provided in the question, we will break down the concepts of bond dissociation energy and electronic repulsion in diatomic molecules, specifically focusing on fluorine (F₂) and chlorine (Cl₂). ### Step-by-Step Solution: 1. **Understanding Bond Dissociation Energy (BDE)**: - Bond dissociation energy is the energy required to break a bond between two atoms in a molecule. Generally, a higher bond dissociation energy indicates a stronger bond. 2. **Comparing F₂ and Cl₂**: - The assertion states that the bond dissociation energy of F₂ is greater than that of Cl₂ (F₂ > Cl₂). This assertion is incorrect. In reality, Cl₂ has a higher bond dissociation energy than F₂. 3. **Reason for the Difference**: - The reason provided states that Cl₂ has more electronic repulsion than F₂. This is also incorrect. In fact, due to the smaller size of the fluorine atom, there is greater inter-electronic repulsion in F₂ compared to Cl₂. 4. **Analyzing Electronic Repulsion**: - In F₂, the two fluorine atoms are closer together because of their smaller atomic size, leading to significant repulsion between the non-bonding electrons. This increased repulsion weakens the bond, resulting in a lower bond dissociation energy. - Conversely, Cl₂ has larger atomic size, which means the electrons are farther apart, resulting in less repulsion and a stronger bond. 5. **Conclusion**: - Both the assertion and the reason are incorrect. The bond dissociation energy of Cl₂ is greater than that of F₂, and Cl₂ has less electronic repulsion than F₂. ### Final Answer: Both the assertion and the reason are incorrect. Therefore, the correct option is D. ---
Doubtnut Promotions Banner Mobile Dark
|

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • Behaviour of Gases

    ALLEN|Exercise All Questions|13 Videos
  • Chemical Equilibrium

    ALLEN|Exercise All Questions|30 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Bond dissociation energy of F_(2) is less that of Cl_(2) give reason.

Assertion: Bond dissociation energy of F_(2) molecule is less than that of Cl_(2) molecule. Reason: Due to inter-electronic repulsion between F atom, F-F bond length in F_(2) molecule is higher than Cl-Cl bond lengthh in Cl_(2) molecule.

Assertion (A): O_(2) is stronger reducing agent than F_(2) Reason (R ): F_(2) is more electronegative.

Assertion :- Bond energy of F_2 is less than Cl_2 . Reason :- Bond length of F_2 is smaller than Cl_2 .

Statement-1 : Bond dissociation energy of F_(2) is more than Cl_(2) . Statement-2 : Due to smaller size of fluorine there are greater electron repulsions between the F atoms than Cl atoms.

Assertion : bond dissociation energy of N-F bond in NF_(3) molecule is lower than that of in NCl_(3) molecule. Reason : Interelectronic repulsion exists between small size N and F atoms N-F bond of NF_(2) molecule.

Assertion : Bond dissociation energy of B-F bond in BF_(3) molecule is lower than C-F bond in CF_(4) molecule. Reason : Atomic size of B-atom is larger than that of C-atom.

Assertion : Bond dissociation energy of B-F bond in BF_(3) molecule is lower than C-F bond in CF_(4) molecule. Reason : Atomic size of B-atom is larger than that of C-atom.

Assertion : bond dissociation energy of N-F bond in NF_(3) molecule is lower than that of in NCl_(3) molecule. Reason : Interelectronic repulsion exists between small size N and F atoms N-F bond of NF_(3) molecule.

Assertion : -I effect of Cl atom is greater than F atom. Reason : Cl atom has more elctronegativity than F atom.