Assertion: Work done in moving a charge between any two points in a unifrom electric field is independent of the path followed by the charge, between these points.
Reason: Electrostatic forces are non-conservative.

Options

A. If both assertion and reason are true and reson is the correct explanation of the assertion.
B. If both assertion and reason are true but reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.
C. If the assertion is true but the reason are false.
D. If both the assertion and reason are false.

Explanation

To analyze the given assertion and reason, we can break down the problem into clear steps:

### Step 1: Understand the Assertion
The assertion states that "Work done in moving a charge between any two points in a uniform electric field is independent of the path followed by the charge, between these points."

In a uniform electric field, the electric field strength (E) is constant in magnitude and direction. The work done (W) on a charge (q) when moving it from point A to point B can be calculated using the formula:
\[ W = q \cdot (V_A - V_B) \]
where \( V_A \) and \( V_B \) are the electric potentials at points A and B, respectively.

Since the work done depends only on the initial and final potentials and not on the path taken, the assertion is **true**.

### Step 2: Understand the Reason
The reason states that "Electrostatic forces are non-conservative."

Electrostatic forces are actually conservative forces. This means that the work done by electrostatic forces in moving a charge between two points is path-independent and depends only on the initial and final positions. Therefore, the reason is **false**.

### Step 3: Conclusion
Now we need to conclude whether the reason explains the assertion. Since the assertion is true and the reason is false, the reason does not explain the assertion.

### Final Answer
- Assertion: True
- Reason: False
- Conclusion: The reason does not explain the assertion.

---