People living in the coastal areas are forced evict their dwelling units as the sea has inundated into the land area. State the possible reasons and suggest measures that could be taken to reduce the deleterious changes in the environment.
People living in the coastal areas are forced evict their dwelling units as the sea has inundated into the land area. State the possible reasons and suggest measures that could be taken to reduce the deleterious changes in the environment.
Text Solution
AI Generated Solution
### Step-by-Step Solution:
1. **Identify the Problem**:
- Coastal areas are experiencing inundation due to rising sea levels, forcing residents to evacuate their homes.
2. **Determine Possible Reasons**:
- **Global Warming**: The increase in greenhouse gases has led to global warming, which raises the Earth's temperature.
- **Melting Polar Ice Caps**: Global warming causes polar ice caps and glaciers to melt, contributing to rising sea levels.
...
|
Topper's Solved these Questions
XII BOARDS
XII BOARD PREVIOUS YEAR PAPER ENGLISH|Exercise Delhi Board : Set II section -A|4 VideosXII BOARDS
XII BOARD PREVIOUS YEAR PAPER ENGLISH|Exercise Delhi Board : Set II section -B|3 VideosXII BOARDS
XII BOARD PREVIOUS YEAR PAPER ENGLISH|Exercise Section - C|39 VideosSAMPLE PAPER 2019
XII BOARD PREVIOUS YEAR PAPER ENGLISH|Exercise Section E Part B|3 Videos
Similar Questions
Explore conceptually related problems
A young sperm whale, 33-foot long was found dead off the coast. It has a large amount of human trash like trash bags, polypropylene sacks, ropes, net segments etc. amounting to 29 kilograms in its digestive system. The whale died because of inflammation of the abdominal lining. Analyze the possible reasons for such mishaps and suggest measures that can be taken to reduce such incidents.
Passage 1 is adapted from an 1823 speech by president james Monre, in which he discusses European colonialism in the Americas. The position expressed in this speech would eventually become known as the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 2 is adapted from a 1095 speech by President Theodore Roosevelt. His position would become known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 1 The American continents, by the free and independent cnditin which they have assumed and maintain, are hence forth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers. The citizens of the United States cherish friendaly sentiments in favor of teh liberty and happiness of their fellow men on the European side of the Atlantic. in the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with out policy to do so. It is only when our rights are invarded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparatin for our defense. With the movements in our own hemisphere we are more immediately connected, by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers. We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and European nations to declear that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system of government to any protion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependncies of any Wuropean powe we have not interfered and shall not interfere. however, we could not view any middling with those former European colonies who have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just rinciples, acknowledged, in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly desposition toward the united States. Passage 2 It isw not true that the united States feels any land hunger or entertains any projects regarding the other nations of the Western Hemisphere except for their welfare. All that this country desires is to see our neighboring countries stable, orderly, and prosperous. Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonalbe efficiency and decency in social and plitical matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need not fear interference from the United States. However, chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention.... In thw Western Hempisphere, the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an inernational police power. If every country washed by the Caribbean Sea would show the progress in stable and just civilization which Cuba has shown since our troops left the island, and which so many of the republics in both Americas are constantly and brilliantly showing, all question of interference by this Nation with their affairs would be at an end. Our intersets and those of our southern neighbors are in reality identical. They have great natural riches, and if within their borders the reign of law and justice obtains, prosperity is sure to come to them. While they thus obey the primary laws of civilized society, they may rest assured that they will be treated by us in a spirit of cordial and helpful sympthy. We would interfere with them only in the last resort, and then only if it became evident that their inability or unwillingness to do justic at home and abroad had violated the rights of the United States or had invited foreign aggression to the determent of the entire body of American nations. Every nation, whether in America or anywhere else, which desires to maintain its freedom and independence must ultimately realize that the right of such independence can not be separated from the respondibility of making good use of it. According to Roosevelt in Passage 2, what circumstance must exist before the United SDtates may justifiably interfere with the affairs of another nation in the Western Hemisphere ?
Knowledge Check
Passage 1 is adapted from an 1823 speech by president james Monre, in which he discusses European colonialism in the Americas. The position expressed in this speech would eventually become known as the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 2 is adapted from a 1095 speech by President Theodore Roosevelt. His position would become known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 1 The American continents, by the free and independent cnditin which they have assumed and maintain, are hence forth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers. The citizens of the United States cherish friendaly sentiments in favor of teh liberty and happiness of their fellow men on the European side of the Atlantic. in the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with out policy to do so. It is only when our rights are invarded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparatin for our defense. With the movements in our own hemisphere we are more immediately connected, by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers. We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and European nations to declear that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system of government to any protion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependncies of any Wuropean powe we have not interfered and shall not interfere. however, we could not view any middling with those former European colonies who have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just rinciples, acknowledged, in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly desposition toward the united States. Passage 2 It isw not true that the united States feels any land hunger or entertains any projects regarding the other nations of the Western Hemisphere except for their welfare. All that this country desires is to see our neighboring countries stable, orderly, and prosperous. Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonalbe efficiency and decency in social and plitical matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need not fear interference from the United States. However, chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention.... In thw Western Hempisphere, the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an inernational police power. If every country washed by the Caribbean Sea would show the progress in stable and just civilization which Cuba has shown since our troops left the island, and which so many of the republics in both Americas are constantly and brilliantly showing, all question of interference by this Nation with their affairs would be at an end. Our intersets and those of our southern neighbors are in reality identical. They have great natural riches, and if within their borders the reign of law and justice obtains, prosperity is sure to come to them. While they thus obey the primary laws of civilized society, they may rest assured that they will be treated by us in a spirit of cordial and helpful sympthy. We would interfere with them only in the last resort, and then only if it became evident that their inability or unwillingness to do justic at home and abroad had violated the rights of the United States or had invited foreign aggression to the determent of the entire body of American nations. Every nation, whether in America or anywhere else, which desires to maintain its freedom and independence must ultimately realize that the right of such independence can not be separated from the respondibility of making good use of it. The primary purpose of the statement in lines 6-9 ("The citizens ...of the Atlantic") is to
Passage 1 is adapted from an 1823 speech by president james Monre, in which he discusses European colonialism in the Americas. The position expressed in this speech would eventually become known as the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 2 is adapted from a 1095 speech by President Theodore Roosevelt. His position would become known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 1 The American continents, by the free and independent cnditin which they have assumed and maintain, are hence forth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers. The citizens of the United States cherish friendaly sentiments in favor of teh liberty and happiness of their fellow men on the European side of the Atlantic. in the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with out policy to do so. It is only when our rights are invarded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparatin for our defense. With the movements in our own hemisphere we are more immediately connected, by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers. We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and European nations to declear that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system of government to any protion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependncies of any Wuropean powe we have not interfered and shall not interfere. however, we could not view any middling with those former European colonies who have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just rinciples, acknowledged, in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly desposition toward the united States. Passage 2 It isw not true that the united States feels any land hunger or entertains any projects regarding the other nations of the Western Hemisphere except for their welfare. All that this country desires is to see our neighboring countries stable, orderly, and prosperous. Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonalbe efficiency and decency in social and plitical matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need not fear interference from the United States. However, chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention.... In thw Western Hempisphere, the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an inernational police power. If every country washed by the Caribbean Sea would show the progress in stable and just civilization which Cuba has shown since our troops left the island, and which so many of the republics in both Americas are constantly and brilliantly showing, all question of interference by this Nation with their affairs would be at an end. Our intersets and those of our southern neighbors are in reality identical. They have great natural riches, and if within their borders the reign of law and justice obtains, prosperity is sure to come to them. While they thus obey the primary laws of civilized society, they may rest assured that they will be treated by us in a spirit of cordial and helpful sympthy. We would interfere with them only in the last resort, and then only if it became evident that their inability or unwillingness to do justic at home and abroad had violated the rights of the United States or had invited foreign aggression to the determent of the entire body of American nations. Every nation, whether in America or anywhere else, which desires to maintain its freedom and independence must ultimately realize that the right of such independence can not be separated from the respondibility of making good use of it. The primary purpose of the statement in lines 6-9 ("The citizens ...of the Atlantic") is to
A
respond to critics of the United States.
B
mislead the audience regarding Monroe's intent.
C
recommend that people adopt a certain attitude.
D
balance the overall tone of the massage.
Passage 1 is adapted from an 1823 speech by president james Monre, in which he discusses European colonialism in the Americas. The position expressed in this speech would eventually become known as the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 2 is adapted from a 1095 speech by President Theodore Roosevelt. His position would become known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 1 The American continents, by the free and independent cnditin which they have assumed and maintain, are hence forth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers. The citizens of the United States cherish friendaly sentiments in favor of teh liberty and happiness of their fellow men on the European side of the Atlantic. in the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with out policy to do so. It is only when our rights are invarded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparatin for our defense. With the movements in our own hemisphere we are more immediately connected, by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers. We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and European nations to declear that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system of government to any protion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependncies of any Wuropean powe we have not interfered and shall not interfere. however, we could not view any middling with those former European colonies who have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just rinciples, acknowledged, in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly desposition toward the united States. Passage 2 It isw not true that the united States feels any land hunger or entertains any projects regarding the other nations of the Western Hemisphere except for their welfare. All that this country desires is to see our neighboring countries stable, orderly, and prosperous. Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonalbe efficiency and decency in social and plitical matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need not fear interference from the United States. However, chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention.... In thw Western Hempisphere, the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an inernational police power. If every country washed by the Caribbean Sea would show the progress in stable and just civilization which Cuba has shown since our troops left the island, and which so many of the republics in both Americas are constantly and brilliantly showing, all question of interference by this Nation with their affairs would be at an end. Our intersets and those of our southern neighbors are in reality identical. They have great natural riches, and if within their borders the reign of law and justice obtains, prosperity is sure to come to them. While they thus obey the primary laws of civilized society, they may rest assured that they will be treated by us in a spirit of cordial and helpful sympthy. We would interfere with them only in the last resort, and then only if it became evident that their inability or unwillingness to do justic at home and abroad had violated the rights of the United States or had invited foreign aggression to the determent of the entire body of American nations. Every nation, whether in America or anywhere else, which desires to maintain its freedom and independence must ultimately realize that the right of such independence can not be separated from the respondibility of making good use of it. When discussing his veews on foreign policy in Passage 1, Monroe indicates that the United States does not inteend to
Passage 1 is adapted from an 1823 speech by president james Monre, in which he discusses European colonialism in the Americas. The position expressed in this speech would eventually become known as the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 2 is adapted from a 1095 speech by President Theodore Roosevelt. His position would become known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 1 The American continents, by the free and independent cnditin which they have assumed and maintain, are hence forth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers. The citizens of the United States cherish friendaly sentiments in favor of teh liberty and happiness of their fellow men on the European side of the Atlantic. in the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with out policy to do so. It is only when our rights are invarded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparatin for our defense. With the movements in our own hemisphere we are more immediately connected, by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers. We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and European nations to declear that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system of government to any protion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependncies of any Wuropean powe we have not interfered and shall not interfere. however, we could not view any middling with those former European colonies who have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just rinciples, acknowledged, in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly desposition toward the united States. Passage 2 It isw not true that the united States feels any land hunger or entertains any projects regarding the other nations of the Western Hemisphere except for their welfare. All that this country desires is to see our neighboring countries stable, orderly, and prosperous. Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonalbe efficiency and decency in social and plitical matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need not fear interference from the United States. However, chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention.... In thw Western Hempisphere, the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an inernational police power. If every country washed by the Caribbean Sea would show the progress in stable and just civilization which Cuba has shown since our troops left the island, and which so many of the republics in both Americas are constantly and brilliantly showing, all question of interference by this Nation with their affairs would be at an end. Our intersets and those of our southern neighbors are in reality identical. They have great natural riches, and if within their borders the reign of law and justice obtains, prosperity is sure to come to them. While they thus obey the primary laws of civilized society, they may rest assured that they will be treated by us in a spirit of cordial and helpful sympthy. We would interfere with them only in the last resort, and then only if it became evident that their inability or unwillingness to do justic at home and abroad had violated the rights of the United States or had invited foreign aggression to the determent of the entire body of American nations. Every nation, whether in America or anywhere else, which desires to maintain its freedom and independence must ultimately realize that the right of such independence can not be separated from the respondibility of making good use of it. When discussing his veews on foreign policy in Passage 1, Monroe indicates that the United States does not inteend to
A
prevent further Euuropean colonization in the Americas.
B
intervene in conficts that exist solely between European powers.
C
maintain a friendly relationship with European powers.
D
allow European powers to keep their existing colonies in the Americas.
Passage 1 is adapted from an 1823 speech by president james Monre, in which he discusses European colonialism in the Americas. The position expressed in this speech would eventually become known as the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 2 is adapted from a 1095 speech by President Theodore Roosevelt. His position would become known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 1 The American continents, by the free and independent cnditin which they have assumed and maintain, are hence forth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers. The citizens of the United States cherish friendaly sentiments in favor of teh liberty and happiness of their fellow men on the European side of the Atlantic. in the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with out policy to do so. It is only when our rights are invarded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparatin for our defense. With the movements in our own hemisphere we are more immediately connected, by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers. We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and European nations to declear that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system of government to any protion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependncies of any Wuropean powe we have not interfered and shall not interfere. however, we could not view any middling with those former European colonies who have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just rinciples, acknowledged, in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly desposition toward the united States. Passage 2 It isw not true that the united States feels any land hunger or entertains any projects regarding the other nations of the Western Hemisphere except for their welfare. All that this country desires is to see our neighboring countries stable, orderly, and prosperous. Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonalbe efficiency and decency in social and plitical matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need not fear interference from the United States. However, chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention.... In thw Western Hempisphere, the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an inernational police power. If every country washed by the Caribbean Sea would show the progress in stable and just civilization which Cuba has shown since our troops left the island, and which so many of the republics in both Americas are constantly and brilliantly showing, all question of interference by this Nation with their affairs would be at an end. Our intersets and those of our southern neighbors are in reality identical. They have great natural riches, and if within their borders the reign of law and justice obtains, prosperity is sure to come to them. While they thus obey the primary laws of civilized society, they may rest assured that they will be treated by us in a spirit of cordial and helpful sympthy. We would interfere with them only in the last resort, and then only if it became evident that their inability or unwillingness to do justic at home and abroad had violated the rights of the United States or had invited foreign aggression to the determent of the entire body of American nations. Every nation, whether in America or anywhere else, which desires to maintain its freedom and independence must ultimately realize that the right of such independence can not be separated from the respondibility of making good use of it. Which choice privides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question ?
Passage 1 is adapted from an 1823 speech by president james Monre, in which he discusses European colonialism in the Americas. The position expressed in this speech would eventually become known as the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 2 is adapted from a 1095 speech by President Theodore Roosevelt. His position would become known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 1 The American continents, by the free and independent cnditin which they have assumed and maintain, are hence forth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers. The citizens of the United States cherish friendaly sentiments in favor of teh liberty and happiness of their fellow men on the European side of the Atlantic. in the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with out policy to do so. It is only when our rights are invarded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparatin for our defense. With the movements in our own hemisphere we are more immediately connected, by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers. We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and European nations to declear that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system of government to any protion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependncies of any Wuropean powe we have not interfered and shall not interfere. however, we could not view any middling with those former European colonies who have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just rinciples, acknowledged, in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly desposition toward the united States. Passage 2 It isw not true that the united States feels any land hunger or entertains any projects regarding the other nations of the Western Hemisphere except for their welfare. All that this country desires is to see our neighboring countries stable, orderly, and prosperous. Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonalbe efficiency and decency in social and plitical matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need not fear interference from the United States. However, chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention.... In thw Western Hempisphere, the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an inernational police power. If every country washed by the Caribbean Sea would show the progress in stable and just civilization which Cuba has shown since our troops left the island, and which so many of the republics in both Americas are constantly and brilliantly showing, all question of interference by this Nation with their affairs would be at an end. Our intersets and those of our southern neighbors are in reality identical. They have great natural riches, and if within their borders the reign of law and justice obtains, prosperity is sure to come to them. While they thus obey the primary laws of civilized society, they may rest assured that they will be treated by us in a spirit of cordial and helpful sympthy. We would interfere with them only in the last resort, and then only if it became evident that their inability or unwillingness to do justic at home and abroad had violated the rights of the United States or had invited foreign aggression to the determent of the entire body of American nations. Every nation, whether in America or anywhere else, which desires to maintain its freedom and independence must ultimately realize that the right of such independence can not be separated from the respondibility of making good use of it. Which choice privides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question ?
A
Lines 9-12 ("In the …do so")
B
Lines 15-19 ("With the …observes ")
C
Lines 20-26 ("We owe…safety")
D
Lines 29-36 ("However …States")
Similar Questions
Explore conceptually related problems
Passage 1 is adapted from an 1823 speech by president james Monre, in which he discusses European colonialism in the Americas. The position expressed in this speech would eventually become known as the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 2 is adapted from a 1095 speech by President Theodore Roosevelt. His position would become known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 1 The American continents, by the free and independent cnditin which they have assumed and maintain, are hence forth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers. The citizens of the United States cherish friendaly sentiments in favor of teh liberty and happiness of their fellow men on the European side of the Atlantic. in the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with out policy to do so. It is only when our rights are invarded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparatin for our defense. With the movements in our own hemisphere we are more immediately connected, by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers. We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and European nations to declear that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system of government to any protion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependncies of any Wuropean powe we have not interfered and shall not interfere. however, we could not view any middling with those former European colonies who have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just rinciples, acknowledged, in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly desposition toward the united States. Passage 2 It isw not true that the united States feels any land hunger or entertains any projects regarding the other nations of the Western Hemisphere except for their welfare. All that this country desires is to see our neighboring countries stable, orderly, and prosperous. Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonalbe efficiency and decency in social and plitical matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need not fear interference from the United States. However, chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention.... In thw Western Hempisphere, the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an inernational police power. If every country washed by the Caribbean Sea would show the progress in stable and just civilization which Cuba has shown since our troops left the island, and which so many of the republics in both Americas are constantly and brilliantly showing, all question of interference by this Nation with their affairs would be at an end. Our intersets and those of our southern neighbors are in reality identical. They have great natural riches, and if within their borders the reign of law and justice obtains, prosperity is sure to come to them. While they thus obey the primary laws of civilized society, they may rest assured that they will be treated by us in a spirit of cordial and helpful sympthy. We would interfere with them only in the last resort, and then only if it became evident that their inability or unwillingness to do justic at home and abroad had violated the rights of the United States or had invited foreign aggression to the determent of the entire body of American nations. Every nation, whether in America or anywhere else, which desires to maintain its freedom and independence must ultimately realize that the right of such independence can not be separated from the respondibility of making good use of it. Which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question
Passage 1 is adapted from an 1823 speech by president james Monre, in which he discusses European colonialism in the Americas. The position expressed in this speech would eventually become known as the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 2 is adapted from a 1095 speech by President Theodore Roosevelt. His position would become known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 1 The American continents, by the free and independent cnditin which they have assumed and maintain, are hence forth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers. The citizens of the United States cherish friendaly sentiments in favor of teh liberty and happiness of their fellow men on the European side of the Atlantic. in the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with out policy to do so. It is only when our rights are invarded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparatin for our defense. With the movements in our own hemisphere we are more immediately connected, by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers. We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and European nations to declear that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system of government to any protion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependncies of any Wuropean powe we have not interfered and shall not interfere. however, we could not view any middling with those former European colonies who have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just rinciples, acknowledged, in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly desposition toward the united States. Passage 2 It isw not true that the united States feels any land hunger or entertains any projects regarding the other nations of the Western Hemisphere except for their welfare. All that this country desires is to see our neighboring countries stable, orderly, and prosperous. Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonalbe efficiency and decency in social and plitical matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need not fear interference from the United States. However, chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention.... In thw Western Hempisphere, the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an inernational police power. If every country washed by the Caribbean Sea would show the progress in stable and just civilization which Cuba has shown since our troops left the island, and which so many of the republics in both Americas are constantly and brilliantly showing, all question of interference by this Nation with their affairs would be at an end. Our intersets and those of our southern neighbors are in reality identical. They have great natural riches, and if within their borders the reign of law and justice obtains, prosperity is sure to come to them. While they thus obey the primary laws of civilized society, they may rest assured that they will be treated by us in a spirit of cordial and helpful sympthy. We would interfere with them only in the last resort, and then only if it became evident that their inability or unwillingness to do justic at home and abroad had violated the rights of the United States or had invited foreign aggression to the determent of the entire body of American nations. Every nation, whether in America or anywhere else, which desires to maintain its freedom and independence must ultimately realize that the right of such independence can not be separated from the respondibility of making good use of it. As used in line 59, "washed" most nearly means
Passage 1 is adapted from an 1823 speech by president james Monre, in which he discusses European colonialism in the Americas. The position expressed in this speech would eventually become known as the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 2 is adapted from a 1095 speech by President Theodore Roosevelt. His position would become known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 1 The American continents, by the free and independent cnditin which they have assumed and maintain, are hence forth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers. The citizens of the United States cherish friendaly sentiments in favor of teh liberty and happiness of their fellow men on the European side of the Atlantic. in the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with out policy to do so. It is only when our rights are invarded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparatin for our defense. With the movements in our own hemisphere we are more immediately connected, by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers. We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and European nations to declear that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system of government to any protion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependncies of any Wuropean powe we have not interfered and shall not interfere. however, we could not view any middling with those former European colonies who have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just rinciples, acknowledged, in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly desposition toward the united States. Passage 2 It isw not true that the united States feels any land hunger or entertains any projects regarding the other nations of the Western Hemisphere except for their welfare. All that this country desires is to see our neighboring countries stable, orderly, and prosperous. Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonalbe efficiency and decency in social and plitical matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need not fear interference from the United States. However, chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention.... In thw Western Hempisphere, the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an inernational police power. If every country washed by the Caribbean Sea would show the progress in stable and just civilization which Cuba has shown since our troops left the island, and which so many of the republics in both Americas are constantly and brilliantly showing, all question of interference by this Nation with their affairs would be at an end. Our intersets and those of our southern neighbors are in reality identical. They have great natural riches, and if within their borders the reign of law and justice obtains, prosperity is sure to come to them. While they thus obey the primary laws of civilized society, they may rest assured that they will be treated by us in a spirit of cordial and helpful sympthy. We would interfere with them only in the last resort, and then only if it became evident that their inability or unwillingness to do justic at home and abroad had violated the rights of the United States or had invited foreign aggression to the determent of the entire body of American nations. Every nation, whether in America or anywhere else, which desires to maintain its freedom and independence must ultimately realize that the right of such independence can not be separated from the respondibility of making good use of it. As used in line 70, "obtains most nearly means
Passage 1 is adapted from an 1823 speech by president james Monre, in which he discusses European colonialism in the Americas. The position expressed in this speech would eventually become known as the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 2 is adapted from a 1095 speech by President Theodore Roosevelt. His position would become known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 1 The American continents, by the free and independent cnditin which they have assumed and maintain, are hence forth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers. The citizens of the United States cherish friendaly sentiments in favor of teh liberty and happiness of their fellow men on the European side of the Atlantic. in the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with out policy to do so. It is only when our rights are invarded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparatin for our defense. With the movements in our own hemisphere we are more immediately connected, by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers. We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and European nations to declear that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system of government to any protion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependncies of any Wuropean powe we have not interfered and shall not interfere. however, we could not view any middling with those former European colonies who have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just rinciples, acknowledged, in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly desposition toward the united States. Passage 2 It isw not true that the united States feels any land hunger or entertains any projects regarding the other nations of the Western Hemisphere except for their welfare. All that this country desires is to see our neighboring countries stable, orderly, and prosperous. Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonalbe efficiency and decency in social and plitical matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need not fear interference from the United States. However, chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention.... In thw Western Hempisphere, the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an inernational police power. If every country washed by the Caribbean Sea would show the progress in stable and just civilization which Cuba has shown since our troops left the island, and which so many of the republics in both Americas are constantly and brilliantly showing, all question of interference by this Nation with their affairs would be at an end. Our intersets and those of our southern neighbors are in reality identical. They have great natural riches, and if within their borders the reign of law and justice obtains, prosperity is sure to come to them. While they thus obey the primary laws of civilized society, they may rest assured that they will be treated by us in a spirit of cordial and helpful sympthy. We would interfere with them only in the last resort, and then only if it became evident that their inability or unwillingness to do justic at home and abroad had violated the rights of the United States or had invited foreign aggression to the determent of the entire body of American nations. Every nation, whether in America or anywhere else, which desires to maintain its freedom and independence must ultimately realize that the right of such independence can not be separated from the respondibility of making good use of it. Which of the following best describes the relationship between the passage ?
Passage 1 is adapted from an 1823 speech by president james Monre, in which he discusses European colonialism in the Americas. The position expressed in this speech would eventually become known as the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 2 is adapted from a 1095 speech by President Theodore Roosevelt. His position would become known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. Passage 1 The American continents, by the free and independent cnditin which they have assumed and maintain, are hence forth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers. The citizens of the United States cherish friendaly sentiments in favor of teh liberty and happiness of their fellow men on the European side of the Atlantic. in the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with out policy to do so. It is only when our rights are invarded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparatin for our defense. With the movements in our own hemisphere we are more immediately connected, by causes which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers. We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and European nations to declear that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system of government to any protion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependncies of any Wuropean powe we have not interfered and shall not interfere. however, we could not view any middling with those former European colonies who have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just rinciples, acknowledged, in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly desposition toward the united States. Passage 2 It isw not true that the united States feels any land hunger or entertains any projects regarding the other nations of the Western Hemisphere except for their welfare. All that this country desires is to see our neighboring countries stable, orderly, and prosperous. Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonalbe efficiency and decency in social and plitical matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need not fear interference from the United States. However, chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention.... In thw Western Hempisphere, the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an inernational police power. If every country washed by the Caribbean Sea would show the progress in stable and just civilization which Cuba has shown since our troops left the island, and which so many of the republics in both Americas are constantly and brilliantly showing, all question of interference by this Nation with their affairs would be at an end. Our intersets and those of our southern neighbors are in reality identical. They have great natural riches, and if within their borders the reign of law and justice obtains, prosperity is sure to come to them. While they thus obey the primary laws of civilized society, they may rest assured that they will be treated by us in a spirit of cordial and helpful sympthy. We would interfere with them only in the last resort, and then only if it became evident that their inability or unwillingness to do justic at home and abroad had violated the rights of the United States or had invited foreign aggression to the determent of the entire body of American nations. Every nation, whether in America or anywhere else, which desires to maintain its freedom and independence must ultimately realize that the right of such independence can not be separated from the respondibility of making good use of it. Based on the informatin contained in the passages, it is likely that Monore and Roosevelt were each motivated at least in part by
XII BOARD PREVIOUS YEAR PAPER ENGLISH-XII BOARDS-Section - D
- People living in the coastal areas are forced evict their dwelling uni...
05:27
|
- A young sperm whale, 33-foot long was found dead off the coast. It has...
03:24
|
- Aneuploidy of chromosomes in human beings results in certain disorders...
06:01
|
- In a dihybrid cross, white eyed, yellow bodied female Drosophila was c...
05:46
|
- Differentiable between spermatogenesis and oogenesis.
02:22
|
- Parturition is induced by a complex neuroendocrine mechanism. Explain.
05:55
|
- Draw a simplified model of phosphorus cycling in a terrestrial ecosyst...
04:20
|
- Write the importance of nutrient cycles in ecosystems.
05:16
|
- (a) Explain the narrowly utilitarian, broadly utilitarian and ethical ...
06:48
|
- (a) How is sex determined in humans ?
03:16
|
- (a) What is a genetic code ?
02:59
|