Assertion: Action and reaction forces act on two different objects
Reason: Action and reaction have zero resultant.

Options

A. IF both assertion and reason are true and reason is the correct explanation of assertion
B. If both assertion and reason are true but reason is not the correct explanation of assertion
C. If assertion is true but reason is false
D. If assertion is false but reason is true

Explanation

To analyze the assertion and reason provided in the question, we will break down the concepts step by step.

### Step 1: Understanding the Assertion
The assertion states that "Action and reaction forces act on two different objects." According to Newton's third law of motion, for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. This means that if one object exerts a force on another object, the second object exerts a force of equal magnitude but in the opposite direction on the first object.

**Example:** If a hammer strikes a nail, the hammer applies a force on the nail (action), and simultaneously, the nail applies an equal and opposite force on the hammer (reaction). These forces act on two different objects: the hammer and the nail.

### Step 2: Evaluating the Reason
The reason given is that "Action and reaction have zero resultant." This statement is misleading. While it is true that the forces are equal and opposite, they do not cancel each other out because they act on different objects. The concept of resultant force applies to a single object, not to two different objects.

**Clarification:** The forces do not have a zero resultant because they do not act on the same body. Instead, they are part of a mutual interaction between two bodies.

### Step 3: Conclusion
- The assertion is **true** because action and reaction forces do act on two different objects.
- The reason is **false** because the action and reaction forces do not have a zero resultant; they act on different objects and thus do not cancel each other out.

### Final Answer
- Assertion: True
- Reason: False

---