Home
Class 11
CHEMISTRY
Assertion (A): Metamers can also be pos...

Assertion (A): Metamers can also be position or chain isomers.
Reason (R ): Tautomerism was introduced by `C.P`. Laar to explain the chemical reactivity of a substance according to two possible structrues.

A

If both (A) and (R ) are true and (R ) is the correct explanation for (A).

B

If both (A) and (R ) are true and (R ) is not the true explanation for (A)

C

If (A) is true, but (R ) is false.

D

If both (A) and (R ) are false

Text Solution

Verified by Experts

The correct Answer is:
B

Both (A) and (R ) are true, but (R ) is not the correct explanation for (A).
Doubtnut Promotions Banner Mobile Dark
|

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • ISOMERISM

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Fill in the blanks (Exercise)|3 Videos
  • ISOMERISM

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise True False (Exercise)|2 Videos
  • ISOMERISM

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Single correct answer type (Exercise)|65 Videos
  • IONIC EQUILIBRIUM

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Archives Subjective|28 Videos
  • NCERT BASED EXERCISE

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Chemical Equilibrium|72 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Metamers can also be chain or position isomers. (R) The term tautomerism was introduced to explain the reactivity of a substance according to two possible structures.

Assertion(A): Alkanes can have an infinite number of conformations Reason(R ):In configurational isomeris,the isomers are distinct individuals substances.

Knowledge Check

  • Assertion (A): A half-cell can also be called redox couple. Reason (R) : According to IUPAC, standard reduction potentials are now called standard electrode potentials.

    A
    Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are correct statements, and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of the Assertion (A).
    B
    Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are correct statements, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of the Assertion (A)
    C
    Assertion (A) is correct, but Reason (R) is incorrect statement.
    D
    Assertion (A) is incorrect, but Reason (R) is correct statement.
  • Assertion: C_(p) can be less than C_(V) . Reason: C_(p)C_(V)=R is valid only for ideal gases.

    A
    If both assertion and Reason are true and the Reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.
    B
    If both assertion and Reason are true but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion
    C
    If assertion is true but reason is false
    D
    If both assertion and reason are false.
  • Assertion (A) : A complete chemical equation represents the reactants and products and their physical state symbolically. Reason (R) : In a combination reaction, two or more substance combine to form a new single substance.

    A
    Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is correct explanation of the assertion.
    B
    Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of the assertion.
    C
    (A) is true but (R) is false.
    D
    (A) is false but (R) is true.
  • Similar Questions

    Explore conceptually related problems

    Assertion (A): Copper and aluminium are two metal which are most commonly used for current electricity. Reason (R ): Conductors are those substances in which electric charge can flow freely.

    Assertion (A): N_(2) is less reactive than P_(4) Reason (R): The electron gain enthalpy of nitrogen is more positive than phosphorous.

    This question consists of two statements each: assertion (A) and reason (R). To answer this question, mark the correct alternative as directed below Assertion: Pain receptors can react to thermal and chemical stimuli also besides mechanical stimuli. Reason: The pain receptors are free nerve endings that penetrate between the epidermal cells.

    Assertion(A): P-orbital can accomadate 6 electrons Reason (R): No two electrons in atom can have same set of four quantum numbers

    This section contains assertion and reason type questions. Each question has 4 choice (1), (2),(3), and (4), out of which only one is correct. Assertion (A) Carbon is tetravalent and forms covalent bond. Reason ( R) Tetravalency can be explained in the terms of its electronic configuration and hybridisation of s- and p – orbitals.