Assertion: The boiling points of alcohols are higher than those of hydrocarbons of comparable molecular mass.
Reason Alcohols show intramolecular hydrogen bonding.

Options

A. Assertion and reason both are correct statements and reason is correct explanation for assertion.
B. Assertion and reason both are correct statements but reason is not correct explanation for assertion.
C. Assertion is correct statement but reason is wrong statement.
D. Assertion is wrong statement but reason is correct statement.

Answer

To solve the question, we need to analyze the assertion and reason provided:

**Assertion**: The boiling points of alcohols are higher than those of hydrocarbons of comparable molecular mass.

**Reason**: Alcohols show intramolecular hydrogen bonding.

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding Boiling Points**:
- Boiling point is influenced by the types of intermolecular forces present in a substance. Alcohols have hydroxyl (-OH) groups that can form hydrogen bonds, which are stronger than the van der Waals forces present in hydrocarbons.

2. **Comparing Alcohols and Hydrocarbons**:
- When comparing an alcohol (ROH) to a hydrocarbon (RH) of similar molecular mass, alcohols will have higher boiling points due to the presence of hydrogen bonding. Hydrocarbons primarily exhibit weaker van der Waals forces.

3. **Intermolecular vs. Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonding**:
- The reason states that alcohols show intramolecular hydrogen bonding. However, in the context of boiling points, it is the intermolecular hydrogen bonding that is significant. Intramolecular hydrogen bonding occurs within a single molecule and does not contribute to the boiling point.

4. **Conclusion**:
- The assertion is correct: alcohols do have higher boiling points than hydrocarbons of comparable molecular mass due to hydrogen bonding.
- The reason is incorrect: alcohols primarily exhibit intermolecular hydrogen bonding, not intramolecular hydrogen bonding.

5. **Final Answer**:
- The correct option is C: Assertion is correct, but the reason is incorrect.