Home
Class 12
BIOLOGY
In view of the current food criis, it is...

In view of the current food criis, it is said , that we need another green revolution. Highlight the major limitations of the eariler greeen revolution..

Text Solution

Verified by Experts

(i) Overuse of fertilisers and pesticides.
(ii) Genetic cap for improvement in food yield.
Doubtnut Promotions Banner Mobile Dark
|

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • BIOTECHNOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATIONS

    MODERN PUBLICATION|Exercise NCERT EXEMPLAR PROBLEMS ( SHORT ANSWER TYPE QUESTIONS)|15 Videos

  • BIOTECHNOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATIONS

    MODERN PUBLICATION|Exercise NCERT EXEMPLAR PROBLEMS ( LONG ANSWER TYPE QUESTIONS)|10 Videos

  • BIOTECHNOLOGY AND ITS APPLICATIONS

    MODERN PUBLICATION|Exercise NCERT EXEMPLAR PROBLEMS (MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS)|15 Videos

  • BIOTECHNOLOGY : PRINCIPLES AND PROCESSES

    MODERN PUBLICATION|Exercise Chapter Practice Test ( Section-E)|2 Videos

  • ECOSYSTEM

    MODERN PUBLICATION|Exercise Chapter Practice Test (Section - D) (Case - Based Short Answer Type Questions)|5 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

What were the limitations of Green Revolution?

Highlight the social consequences of Green Revolution.

Knowledge Check

  • The stark observation made in the Economic Survey of 2015-16 that “Indian agriculture, is in a way, a victim of its own past success - especially the green revolution", shows the dark reality of the agriculture sector at present and the havoc that has been wreaked by the green revolution. The green revolution, which is often characterised by the introduction of high-yielding variety of seeds and fertilisers, undoubtedly increased the productivity of land considerably. But the growth in the productivity has been stagnant in recent years, resulting in a significant decline in the income of farmers. There have also been negative environmental effects in the form of depleting water table, emission of greenhouse gases, and the contamination of surface and ground water. Needless to say, the agriculture sector is in a state of distress, which is severely affecting peasants and marginal farmers, and urgent policy interventions are required to protect their interests.The government has responded to the problem by constituting a panel, which will recommend ways to double the income of farmers by 2022. While this may be an overtly ambitious target, if we want to boost stagnated agricultural growth a shift has to be made from food security of the nation to income security of the farmers. However, there are many hurdles that have to be crossed if we want to achieve this objective. The first major barrier to overcome is declining productivity. Data from 2013 reveals that India.s average yield of cereal per hectare is far less than that of many countries (including several low income countries), but the difference is huge when compared to China. For instance, our average yield per hectare is 39% below than that of China and for rice this figure is 46%. Even Bangladesh, Vietnam and Indonesia fare better than India in case of rice yield. Further, there is a huge inter-regional variation, the wheat and rice yield from Haryana and Punjabis much higher than from the other states. In order to cross the declining productivity barrier there is a need to herald a rainbow revolution by making a shift from wheat-rice cycle to other cereals and pulses. Since wheat and rice coupled with other crops are backed by minimum support prices (MSP) and input subsidy (whether water, fertiliser or power) regime, there is a huge incentive for the farmers in the irrigated region of Northwest India to grow these crops. As per the passage, which country has the highest yield of rice per hectare?

    A
    Vietnam
    B
    Bangladesh
    C
    China
    D
    Indonesia

  • The stark observation made in the Economic Survey of 2015-16 that “Indian agriculture, is in a way, a victim of its own past success - especially the green revolution", shows the dark reality of the agriculture sector at present and the havoc that has been wreaked by the green revolution. The green revolution, which is often characterised by the introduction of high-yielding variety of seeds and fertilisers, undoubtedly increased the productivity of land considerably. But the growth in the productivity has been stagnant in recent years, resulting in a significant decline in the income of farmers. There have also been negative environmental effects in the form of depleting water table, emission of greenhouse gases, and the contamination of surface and ground water. Needless to say, the agriculture sector is in a state of distress, which is severely affecting peasants and marginal farmers, and urgent policy interventions are required to protect their interests.The government has responded to the problem by constituting a panel, which will recommend ways to double the income of farmers by 2022. While this may be an overtly ambitious target, if we want to boost stagnated agricultural growth a shift has to be made from food security of the nation to income security of the farmers. However, there are many hurdles that have to be crossed if we want to achieve this objective. The first major barrier to overcome is declining productivity. Data from 2013 reveals that India.s average yield of cereal per hectare is far less than that of many countries (including several low income countries), but the difference is huge when compared to China. For instance, our average yield per hectare is 39% below than that of China and for rice this figure is 46%. Even Bangladesh, Vietnam and Indonesia fare better than India in case of rice yield. Further, there is a huge inter-regional variation, the wheat and rice yield from Haryana and Punjabis much higher than from the other states. In order to cross the declining productivity barrier there is a need to herald a rainbow revolution by making a shift from wheat-rice cycle to other cereals and pulses. Since wheat and rice coupled with other crops are backed by minimum support prices (MSP) and input subsidy (whether water, fertiliser or power) regime, there is a huge incentive for the farmers in the irrigated region of Northwest India to grow these crops. Which statement is NOT true according to the passage?

    A
    High yielding seeds and fertilizers were a hallmark of green revolution
    B
    The rice yield in India is below that of China by 39%.
    C
    The growth in productivity has stagnated today.
    D
    In Northwest India, farmers get subsidies on rice, wheat and other crops.

  • The stark observation made in the Economic Survey of 2015-16 that “Indian agriculture, is in a way, a victim of its own past success - especially the green revolution", shows the dark reality of the agriculture sector at present and the havoc that has been wreaked by the green revolution. The green revolution, which is often characterised by the introduction of high-yielding variety of seeds and fertilisers, undoubtedly increased the productivity of land considerably. But the growth in the productivity has been stagnant in recent years, resulting in a significant decline in the income of farmers. There have also been negative environmental effects in the form of depleting water table, emission of greenhouse gases, and the contamination of surface and ground water. Needless to say, the agriculture sector is in a state of distress, which is severely affecting peasants and marginal farmers, and urgent policy interventions are required to protect their interests.The government has responded to the problem by constituting a panel, which will recommend ways to double the income of farmers by 2022. While this may be an overtly ambitious target, if we want to boost stagnated agricultural growth a shift has to be made from food security of the nation to income security of the farmers. However, there are many hurdles that have to be crossed if we want to achieve this objective. The first major barrier to overcome is declining productivity. Data from 2013 reveals that India.s average yield of cereal per hectare is far less than that of many countries (including several low income countries), but the difference is huge when compared to China. For instance, our average yield per hectare is 39% below than that of China and for rice this figure is 46%. Even Bangladesh, Vietnam and Indonesia fare better than India in case of rice yield. Further, there is a huge inter-regional variation, the wheat and rice yield from Haryana and Punjabis much higher than from the other states. In order to cross the declining productivity barrier there is a need to herald a rainbow revolution by making a shift from wheat-rice cycle to other cereals and pulses. Since wheat and rice coupled with other crops are backed by minimum support prices (MSP) and input subsidy (whether water, fertiliser or power) regime, there is a huge incentive for the farmers in the irrigated region of Northwest India to grow these crops. What does the author suggest to enhance the income of the farmers?

    A
    Constitute a panel to suggest ways to double the income
    B
    Provide income security to the farmers
    C
    Givesubsidies on water, fertilizers and power
    D
    Shift wheat-rice cycle to include other cereals and pulses

    • Similar Questions

    Explore conceptually related problems

    The stark observation made in the Economic Survey of 2015-16 that “Indian agriculture, is in a way, a victim of its own past success - especially the green revolution", shows the dark reality of the agriculture sector at present and the havoc that has been wreaked by the green revolution. The green revolution, which is often characterised by the introduction of high-yielding variety of seeds and fertilisers, undoubtedly increased the productivity of land considerably. But the growth in the productivity has been stagnant in recent years, resulting in a significant decline in the income of farmers. There have also been negative environmental effects in the form of depleting water table, emission of greenhouse gases, and the contamination of surface and ground water. Needless to say, the agriculture sector is in a state of distress, which is severely affecting peasants and marginal farmers, and urgent policy interventions are required to protect their interests.The government has responded to the problem by constituting a panel, which will recommend ways to double the income of farmers by 2022. While this may be an overtly ambitious target, if we want to boost stagnated agricultural growth a shift has to be made from food security of the nation to income security of the farmers. However, there are many hurdles that have to be crossed if we want to achieve this objective. The first major barrier to overcome is declining productivity. Data from 2013 reveals that India.s average yield of cereal per hectare is far less than that of many countries (including several low income countries), but the difference is huge when compared to China. For instance, our average yield per hectare is 39% below than that of China and for rice this figure is 46%. Even Bangladesh, Vietnam and Indonesia fare better than India in case of rice yield. Further, there is a huge inter-regional variation, the wheat and rice yield from Haryana and Punjabis much higher than from the other states. In order to cross the declining productivity barrier there is a need to herald a rainbow revolution by making a shift from wheat-rice cycle to other cereals and pulses. Since wheat and rice coupled with other crops are backed by minimum support prices (MSP) and input subsidy (whether water, fertiliser or power) regime, there is a huge incentive for the farmers in the irrigated region of Northwest India to grow these crops. The purpose of this passage is to

    The stark observation made in the Economic Survey of 2015-16 that “Indian agriculture, is in a way, a victim of its own past success - especially the green revolution", shows the dark reality of the agriculture sector at present and the havoc that has been wreaked by the green revolution. The green revolution, which is often characterised by the introduction of high-yielding variety of seeds and fertilisers, undoubtedly increased the productivity of land considerably. But the growth in the productivity has been stagnant in recent years, resulting in a significant decline in the income of farmers. There have also been negative environmental effects in the form of depleting water table, emission of greenhouse gases, and the contamination of surface and ground water. Needless to say, the agriculture sector is in a state of distress, which is severely affecting peasants and marginal farmers, and urgent policy interventions are required to protect their interests.The government has responded to the problem by constituting a panel, which will recommend ways to double the income of farmers by 2022. While this may be an overtly ambitious target, if we want to boost stagnated agricultural growth a shift has to be made from food security of the nation to income security of the farmers. However, there are many hurdles that have to be crossed if we want to achieve this objective. The first major barrier to overcome is declining productivity. Data from 2013 reveals that India.s average yield of cereal per hectare is far less than that of many countries (including several low income countries), but the difference is huge when compared to China. For instance, our average yield per hectare is 39% below than that of China and for rice this figure is 46%. Even Bangladesh, Vietnam and Indonesia fare better than India in case of rice yield. Further, there is a huge inter-regional variation, the wheat and rice yield from Haryana and Punjabis much higher than from the other states. In order to cross the declining productivity barrier there is a need to herald a rainbow revolution by making a shift from wheat-rice cycle to other cereals and pulses. Since wheat and rice coupled with other crops are backed by minimum support prices (MSP) and input subsidy (whether water, fertiliser or power) regime, there is a huge incentive for the farmers in the irrigated region of Northwest India to grow these crops. As per the passage, what is the main cause of decline in the income of farmers?

    The stark observation made in the Economic Survey of 2015-16 that “Indian agriculture, is in a way, a victim of its own past success - especially the green revolution”, shows the dark reality of the agriculture sector at present and the havoc that has been wreaked by the green revolution. The green revolution, which is often characterized by the introduction of a high-yielding variety of seeds and fertilizers, undoubtedly increased the productivity of land considerably. But the growth in the productivity has been stagnant in recent years, resulting in a significant decline in the income of farmers. There have also been negative environmental effects in the form of depleting water table, emission of greenhouse gases, and the contamination of surface and groundwater. Needless to say, the agricultural sector is in a state of distress, which is severely affecting peasants and marginal farmers, and urgent p olicy interventions are required to protect their interests. The government has responded to the problem by constituting a panel, which will ecommend ways t o double the income of farmers by 202(b) While t his may be an overly ambitious target, if we want to boost stagnated agricultural growth a shift has to be made from food security of the nation to income security of the farmers. However, there are m any hurdles that have to be crossed if we want to achieve this objective. The first major barrier to overcome is declining productivity. Data from 2013 reveals that India’s average yield of cereals per hectare is far less than that of many countries ( including several low income countries), but the difference is huge when compared to China. For instance, our average yield per hectare is 39% below than that o f china and for rice this figure is 46%. Even Bangladesh, Vietnam and Indonesia fare better than India incase of rice yield. Further, there is a huge inter-regional variation, the wheat and rice yield from Haryana and Punjab is much higher than from the other states. In order to cross the declining productivity barrier there is a need to herald a rainbow revolution by making a shift from wheat-rice cycle to other cereals and pulses. Since wheat and rice coupled with other crops are backed by minimum s upport prices (MSP) and input subsidy (whether water, fertiliser or power) regime, there is a huge incentive f or farmers in the irrigated region of Northwest India to grow these crops. Which statement is NOT true according to the passage ?

    The stark observation made in the Economic Survey of 2015-16 that “Indian agriculture, is in a way, a victim of its own past success - especially the green revolution”, shows the dark reality of the agriculture sector at present and the havoc that has been wreaked by the green revolution. The green revolution, which is often characterized by the introduction of a high-yielding variety of seeds and fertilizers, undoubtedly increased the productivity of land considerably. But the growth in the productivity has been stagnant in recent years, resulting in a significant decline in the income of farmers. There have also been negative environmental effects in the form of depleting water table, emission of greenhouse gases, and the contamination of surface and groundwater. Needless to say, the agricultural sector is in a state of distress, which is severely affecting peasants and marginal farmers, and urgent p olicy interventions are required to protect their interests. The government has responded to the problem by constituting a panel, which will ecommend ways t o double the income of farmers by 202(b) While t his may be an overly ambitious target, if we want to boost stagnated agricultural growth a shift has to be made from food security of the nation to income security of the farmers. However, there are m any hurdles that have to be crossed if we want to achieve this objective. The first major barrier to overcome is declining productivity. Data from 2013 reveals that India’s average yield of cereals per hectare is far less than that of many countries ( including several low income countries), but the difference is huge when compared to China. For instance, our average yield per hectare is 39% below than that o f china and for rice this figure is 46%. Even Bangladesh, Vietnam and Indonesia fare better than India incase of rice yield. Further, there is a huge inter-regional variation, the wheat and rice yield from Haryana and Punjab is much higher than from the other states. In order to cross the declining productivity barrier there is a need to herald a rainbow revolution by making a shift from wheat-rice cycle to other cereals and pulses. Since wheat and rice coupled with other crops are backed by minimum s upport prices (MSP) and input subsidy (whether water, fertiliser or power) regime, there is a huge incentive f or farmers in the irrigated region of Northwest India to grow these crops. The purpose of this passage is to

    The stark observation made in the Economic Survey of 2015-16 that “Indian agriculture, is in a way, a victim of its own past success - especially the green revolution”, shows the dark reality of the agriculture sector at present and the havoc that has been wreaked by the green revolution. The green revolution, which is often characterized by the introduction of a high-yielding variety of seeds and fertilizers, undoubtedly increased the productivity of land considerably. But the growth in the productivity has been stagnant in recent years, resulting in a significant decline in the income of farmers. There have also been negative environmental effects in the form of depleting water table, emission of greenhouse gases, and the contamination of surface and groundwater. Needless to say, the agricultural sector is in a state of distress, which is severely affecting peasants and marginal farmers, and urgent p olicy interventions are required to protect their interests. The government has responded to the problem by constituting a panel, which will ecommend ways t o double the income of farmers by 202(b) While t his may be an overly ambitious target, if we want to boost stagnated agricultural growth a shift has to be made from food security of the nation to income security of the farmers. However, there are m any hurdles that have to be crossed if we want to achieve this objective. The first major barrier to overcome is declining productivity. Data from 2013 reveals that India’s average yield of cereals per hectare is far less than that of many countries ( including several low income countries), but the difference is huge when compared to China. For instance, our average yield per hectare is 39% below than that o f china and for rice this figure is 46%. Even Bangladesh, Vietnam and Indonesia fare better than India incase of rice yield. Further, there is a huge inter-regional variation, the wheat and rice yield from Haryana and Punjab is much higher than from the other states. In order to cross the declining productivity barrier there is a need to herald a rainbow revolution by making a shift from wheat-rice cycle to other cereals and pulses. Since wheat and rice coupled with other crops are backed by minimum s upport prices (MSP) and input subsidy (whether water, fertiliser or power) regime, there is a huge incentive f or farmers in the irrigated region of Northwest India to grow these crops. As per the passage, which country has the highest yield of rice per hectare?

    Home
    Profile