If you needed to take a blood sample during the time in a woman’s menstrual cycle when the concentration of her gonadotropic hormones would be at their lowest levels, which of the following days on average would be the best choices for sampling?

There are two ways in which, 'nonasserters' manage a conflict. Sometimes they ignore their needs. Faced with a constantly barking dog, for instance, a nonassertive person would try to forget the barking by closing the windows and trying to concentrate even harder. Another form of denial would be to claim that no problem exists-that a little barking never bothered anyone. To the degree that it's possible to make problems disappear by ignoring them, such an approach is probably advisable. In many cases, however, it simply isn't realistic to claim that nothing is wrong. For instance, if your health is beingjeopardized by the cigarette smoke from someone nearby, you are clearly punishing yourself by remaining silent. If you need to learn more information from a supervisor before undertaking a project, you reduce the quality ofyourworkby pretending that you understand it at all. If you claim that an unsatisfactory repair job is acceptable, you are paying good money for nothing. In all these and many more cases simply pretending that nothing is the matter when your needs continue to go unmet is clearly not the answer. A second nonassertive course of action is to acknowledge your needs are not being met but simply to accept the situation, hoping that it might clear up without any action on your part. You could, for instance, wait for the neighbour who owns the barking dog to move. Y ciu could wait for the dog to be run over by passing car or to die of old age. You could hope that your neighbour will realize how noisy the dog is and do something to keep it quiet. Each of these occurrences is a possibility, of course, but it would be unrealistic to count on one of them to solve your problem. And even if by chance you were lucky enough forthe dog problem to solve without taking action, you couldn't expect to be so fortunate in other parts of your life. In addition, while waiting for one of these eventualities, you would undoubtedly grow more and more angry at your neighbour, making a friendly relationship between the two of you impossible. You would also lose a degree of selfrespect, since you would see yourself as the kind of person who can't cope with even a common everyday irritation. Clearly, non-ssertion is not a very satisfying course of action either in this case or in other instances. Nonassertive behaviour cannot lead to.:

There are two ways in which, 'nonasserters' manage a conflict. Sometimes they ignore their needs. Faced with a constantly barking dog, for instance, a nonassertive person would try to forget the barking by closing the windows and trying to concentrate even harder. Another form of denial would be to claim that no problem exists-that a little barking never bothered anyone. To the degree that it's possible to make problems disappear by ignoring them, such an approach is probably advisable. In many cases, however, it simply isn't realistic to claim that nothing is wrong. For instance, if your health is beingjeopardized by the cigarette smoke from someone nearby, you are clearly punishing yourself by remaining silent. If you need to learn more information from a supervisor before undertaking a project, you reduce the quality ofyourworkby pretending that you understand it at all. If you claim that an unsatisfactory repair job is acceptable, you are paying good money for nothing. In all these and many more cases simply pretending that nothing is the matter when your needs continue to go unmet is clearly not the answer. A second nonassertive course of action is to acknowledge your needs are not being met but simply to accept the situation, hoping that it might clear up without any action on your part. You could, for instance, wait for the neighbour who owns the barking dog to move. Y ciu could wait for the dog to be run over by passing car or to die of old age. You could hope that your neighbour will realize how noisy the dog is and do something to keep it quiet. Each of these occurrences is a possibility, of course, but it would be unrealistic to count on one of them to solve your problem. And even if by chance you were lucky enough forthe dog problem to solve without taking action, you couldn't expect to be so fortunate in other parts of your life. In addition, while waiting for one of these eventualities, you would undoubtedly grow more and more angry at your neighbour, making a friendly relationship between the two of you impossible. You would also lose a degree of selfrespect, since you would see yourself as the kind of person who can't cope with even a common everyday irritation. Clearly, non-ssertion is not a very satisfying course of action either in this case or in other instances. On reading the passage, one can conclude that :

There are two ways in which, 'nonasserters' manage a conflict. Sometimes they ignore their needs. Faced with a constantly barking dog, for instance, a nonassertive person would try to forget the barking by closing the windows and trying to concentrate even harder. Another form of denial would be to claim that no problem exists-that a little barking never bothered anyone. To the degree that it's possible to make problems disappear by ignoring them, such an approach is probably advisable. In many cases, however, it simply isn't realistic to claim that nothing is wrong. For instance, if your health is beingjeopardized by the cigarette smoke from someone nearby, you are clearly punishing yourself by remaining silent. If you need to learn more information from a supervisor before undertaking a project, you reduce the quality ofyourworkby pretending that you understand it at all. If you claim that an unsatisfactory repair job is acceptable, you are paying good money for nothing. In all these and many more cases simply pretending that nothing is the matter when your needs continue to go unmet is clearly not the answer. A second nonassertive course of action is to acknowledge your needs are not being met but simply to accept the situation, hoping that it might clear up without any action on your part. You could, for instance, wait for the neighbour who owns the barking dog to move. Y ciu could wait for the dog to be run over by passing car or to die of old age. You could hope that your neighbour will realize how noisy the dog is and do something to keep it quiet. Each of these occurrences is a possibility, of course, but it would be unrealistic to count on one of them to solve your problem. And even if by chance you were lucky enough forthe dog problem to solve without taking action, you couldn't expect to be so fortunate in other parts of your life. In addition, while waiting for one of these eventualities, you would undoubtedly grow more and more angry at your neighbour, making a friendly relationship between the two of you impossible. You would also lose a degree of selfrespect, since you would see yourself as the kind of person who can't cope with even a common everyday irritation. Clearly, non-ssertion is not a very satisfying course of action either in this case or in other instances. According to the passage, non-assertive people do not:

There are two ways in which, 'nonasserters' manage a conflict. Sometimes they ignore their needs. Faced with a constantly barking dog, for instance, a nonassertive person would try to forget the barking by closing the windows and trying to concentrate even harder. Another form of denial would be to claim that no problem exists-that a little barking never bothered anyone. To the degree that it's possible to make problems disappear by ignoring them, such an approach is probably advisable. In many cases, however, it simply isn't realistic to claim that nothing is wrong. For instance, if your health is beingjeopardized by the cigarette smoke from someone nearby, you are clearly punishing yourself by remaining silent. If you need to learn more information from a supervisor before undertaking a project, you reduce the quality ofyourworkby pretending that you understand it at all. If you claim that an unsatisfactory repair job is acceptable, you are paying good money for nothing. In all these and many more cases simply pretending that nothing is the matter when your needs continue to go unmet is clearly not the answer. A second nonassertive course of action is to acknowledge your needs are not being met but simply to accept the situation, hoping that it might clear up without any action on your part. You could, for instance, wait for the neighbour who owns the barking dog to move. Y ciu could wait for the dog to be run over by passing car or to die of old age. You could hope that your neighbour will realize how noisy the dog is and do something to keep it quiet. Each of these occurrences is a possibility, of course, but it would be unrealistic to count on one of them to solve your problem. And even if by chance you were lucky enough forthe dog problem to solve without taking action, you couldn't expect to be so fortunate in other parts of your life. In addition, while waiting for one of these eventualities, you would undoubtedly grow more and more angry at your neighbour, making a friendly relationship between the two of you impossible. You would also lose a degree of selfrespect, since you would see yourself as the kind of person who can't cope with even a common everyday irritation. Clearly, non-ssertion is not a very satisfying course of action either in this case or in other instances. The passage indicates that people who do not assert themselves are likely to :

There are two ways in which, 'nonasserters' manage a conflict. Sometimes they ignore their needs. Faced with a constantly barking dog, for instance, a nonassertive person would try to forget the barking by closing the windows and trying to concentrate even harder. Another form of denial would be to claim that no problem exists-that a little barking never bothered anyone. To the degree that it's possible to make problems disappear by ignoring them, such an approach is probably advisable. In many cases, however, it simply isn't realistic to claim that nothing is wrong. For instance, if your health is beingjeopardized by the cigarette smoke from someone nearby, you are clearly punishing yourself by remaining silent. If you need to learn more information from a supervisor before undertaking a project, you reduce the quality ofyourworkby pretending that you understand it at all. If you claim that an unsatisfactory repair job is acceptable, you are paying good money for nothing. In all these and many more cases simply pretending that nothing is the matter when your needs continue to go unmet is clearly not the answer. A second nonassertive course of action is to acknowledge your needs are not being met but simply to accept the situation, hoping that it might clear up without any action on your part. You could, for instance, wait for the neighbour who owns the barking dog to move. Y ciu could wait for the dog to be run over by passing car or to die of old age. You could hope that your neighbour will realize how noisy the dog is and do something to keep it quiet. Each of these occurrences is a possibility, of course, but it would be unrealistic to count on one of them to solve your problem. And even if by chance you were lucky enough forthe dog problem to solve without taking action, you couldn't expect to be so fortunate in other parts of your life. In addition, while waiting for one of these eventualities, you would undoubtedly grow more and more angry at your neighbour, making a friendly relationship between the two of you impossible. You would also lose a degree of selfrespect, since you would see yourself as the kind of person who can't cope with even a common everyday irritation. Clearly, non-ssertion is not a very satisfying course of action either in this case or in other instances. 'Nonasserters' manage a conflict by:

If you needed to take a blood sample during the time in a woman’s menstrual cycle when the concentration of her gonadotropic hormones would be at their lowest levels, which of the following days on average would be the best choices for sampling?

Text Solution

Topper's Solved these Questions

Similar Questions

Knowledge Check

Similar Questions

KVPY PREVIOUS YEAR-MOCK TEST 5-EXERCISE