A : Fluorine acts as a stronger oxidising agent than chlorine.
R : Standard reduction potential of fluorine is higher than `Cl_(2)`

Options

A. If both Assertion & Reason are true and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion, then mark (1).
B. If both Assertion & Reason are true but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion, then mark (2).
C. If Assertion is true statement but Reason is false, then mark (3).
D. If both Assertion and Reason are false statements, then mark (4).

Answer

To solve the question regarding the assertion and reason statements about the oxidizing abilities of fluorine and chlorine, we will analyze each statement step by step.

### Step 1: Analyze the Assertion
**Assertion (A)**: Fluorine acts as a stronger oxidizing agent than chlorine.

- **Explanation**: An oxidizing agent is a substance that gains electrons in a chemical reaction and is reduced. The strength of an oxidizing agent is determined by its ability to gain electrons, which is quantified by its standard reduction potential (E°).

### Step 2: Analyze the Reason
**Reason (R)**: The standard reduction potential of fluorine is higher than that of chlorine.

- **Explanation**: The standard reduction potential indicates how readily a species gains electrons. A higher standard reduction potential means a greater tendency to be reduced, thus acting as a stronger oxidizing agent.

### Step 3: Compare the Standard Reduction Potentials
- The standard reduction potential for the half-reaction of fluorine (F2 + 2e⁻ → 2F⁻) is approximately +2.87 V.
- The standard reduction potential for the half-reaction of chlorine (Cl2 + 2e⁻ → 2Cl⁻) is approximately +1.36 V.

### Step 4: Conclusion
- Since the standard reduction potential of fluorine (+2.87 V) is higher than that of chlorine (+1.36 V), it confirms that fluorine is indeed a stronger oxidizing agent than chlorine.

### Final Answer
Both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason correctly explains the assertion. Therefore, the answer is that both statements are true, and the reason is the correct explanation for the assertion.

---