The Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion (VSEPR) theory is used to predict the shape of individual molecules on the number of electron pairs surrounding their central atoms. The idea is that electron pairs, whether bonding or non-bonding, repel one another and will spread out as far apart as possible to minimize the repulsion.
Sidgwick and Powell proposed that the repulsion between electron pairs in the valence shell of the central atom determines the shape of a molecule. They emphasized that both bonding and lone pairs repel each other, leading to a spatial arrangement that minimizes repulsion. This idea offered a straightforward explanation for molecular shapes, advancing the understanding of chemical bonding.
Ronald Nyholm and Ronald Gillespie expanded Sidgwick and Powell's ideas, refining VSEPR theory by highlighting the role of lone pairs in determining molecular shape. They recognized that lone pairs exert more repulsion than bonding pairs, leading to distortions in geometry. Their key contributions included classifying electron pairs into bonding and lone pairs, which allowed for more accurate predictions of molecular shapes, including deviations caused by lone pairs. They also introduced specific geometries like linear, trigonal planar, tetrahedral, and modified shapes like bent and trigonal pyramidal.
Nyholm and Gillespie (1957) refined the VSEPR model, indicating the greater repulsion between lone pairs of electrons compared to bond pairs. This leads to deviations from idealized shapes and alterations in bond angles. The VSEPR theory categorizes molecules based on whether the central atom has lone pairs or not.
Based on these principles, the VSEPR theory predicts various molecular geometries, including:
(Molecules having lone pairs on the Central atom, where E represents lone pair)
While VSEPR theory is useful for predicting the shapes of many molecules, it has some limitations:
Doesn't Consider Electron Delocalization:
In cases where electrons are delocalized over several atoms (as in resonance structures), VSEPR may not accurately predict geometry.
Limited to Main Group Elements:
The theory primarily applies to compounds of main group elements and may not work as well for transition metals with complex d-orbital interactions.
Doesn’t Account for Bond Strengths:
VSEPR doesn’t consider differences in bond strengths (single, double, triple bonds) which can also affect molecular geometry.
(Session 2025 - 26)