Assertion (A): `S` reacts with `SO_(3)^(2-)` and forms `S_(2)O_(3)^(2-)`
Reason (R) : `S` is electorn deficient and acts and acid and `SO_(3)^(2-)` is a base in terms of Lewis acid theroy.

Options

A. If both (A) and (R) are correc, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).
B. If both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
C. If (A) is correct, but (R) is incorrect.
D. If (A) is incorrect, but (R) is correct.

Answer

A

Explanation

Both `(A)` and `(R)` is correct and `(R)` is correct explanantion of `(A)`
`underset(("Acid"))( :ddotunderset(..)S)+underset(("Base"))([overset( :ddotO: )overset(|)undersetunderset(..)( :O: )underset(|)( :S)-underset(..)overset(..)O:])rarr [:overset(..)underset(..)S-overset( :ddotO: )overset(|)undersetunderset(..)( :O: )underset(|)(S)-underset(..)overset(..)O:]^(2-)`