Home
Class 11
CHEMISTRY
How would you explain the fact that the ...

How would you explain the fact that the first ionisation enthalpy of sodium is lower than that of magnesium but its second ionisation enthalpy is higher than that of magnesium?

Text Solution

Verified by Experts

The electronic configurations of `Na` and `Mg` are
`Na:1s^(2)2s^(2)2p^(6)3s^(1) Mg:1s^(2)2s^(2)2p^(6)3s^(2)`
Thus, the first electron in both the cases has to be removed from the `3s`-orbital but the nuclear charge of `Na(+11)` is lower than that of `Mg(+12)`, therefore, the `IE_(1)` of sodium is lower than that of magensium.
After the loss of first electron, the electronic configuration of `Na^(o+)` is `1s^(2)2s^(2)2p^(6)`. Here, the electron is to be removed from inert(neon) gas configuration which is very group stable and hence removal of second electron from sodium is very difficult.
However, in case of magesium, after the loss of first electron, the electronic configuration of `Mg^(o+)` is `1s^(2)2s^(2)2p^(6)3s^(1)`. Here, the electron is to be removed from a `3s` orbital which is much easier than to remove an electron from inert gas configuration. Therefore, the `IE_(2)` of sodium is higher that that magnesium.
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • APPENDIX - INORGANIC VOLUME 1

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Exercise very short|70 Videos
  • APPENDIX - INORGANIC VOLUME 1

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Exercise Short|146 Videos
  • ALKYNES

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Exercises (Archives - Analytical and Desriptive Type)|4 Videos
  • ATOMIC STRUCTURE

    CENGAGE CHEMISTRY|Exercise Concept Applicationexercise(4.3)|19 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

How would you explain the fact that the first ionization enthalpy of Lithium is lesser than that of Beryllium but its second ionization enthalpy is greater than that of Beryllium?

Why first ionisation enthalpy of Cr is lower than that of Zn?

The first ionization enthalpy of O is lower than that of N.

The first ionisation energy of silicon is lower than that of