Home
Class 12
PHYSICS
The ratio of intensities of consecutive ...

The ratio of intensities of consecutive maxima in the diffraction pattern due to a single slit is

A

(a) `1:4:9`

B

(b) `1:2:3`

C

(c) `1:(4)/(9pi^2):(4)/(25pi^2)`

D

(d) `1:(1)/(pi^2):(9)/(pi^2)`

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To find the ratio of the intensities of consecutive maxima in the diffraction pattern due to a single slit, we can follow these steps: ### Step 1: Understand the Diffraction Pattern The diffraction pattern produced by a single slit consists of a central maximum and several secondary maxima on either side. The intensity of these maxima decreases as we move away from the center. ### Step 2: Intensity Formula The intensity \( I \) of the maxima in a single slit diffraction pattern can be expressed using the formula: \[ I(\theta) = I_0 \left( \frac{\sin(\beta)}{\beta} \right)^2 \] where \( \beta = \frac{\pi a \sin(\theta)}{\lambda} \), \( a \) is the slit width, \( \lambda \) is the wavelength of light, and \( \theta \) is the angle of diffraction. ### Step 3: Identify Consecutive Maxima The positions of the maxima can be found at angles where \( \sin(\beta) \) is maximized. The first few maxima occur at angles corresponding to \( \beta = n\pi \) for \( n = 1, 2, 3, \ldots \). ### Step 4: Calculate Intensities of Consecutive Maxima The intensity of the first maximum (at \( n=1 \)) can be denoted as \( I_1 \), and the second maximum (at \( n=2 \)) can be denoted as \( I_2 \). The ratio of the intensities of these maxima can be calculated as follows: \[ \frac{I_1}{I_2} = \frac{I_0 \left( \frac{\sin(\beta_1)}{\beta_1} \right)^2}{I_0 \left( \frac{\sin(\beta_2)}{\beta_2} \right)^2} \] where \( \beta_1 = \frac{\pi a \sin(\theta_1)}{\lambda} \) and \( \beta_2 = \frac{\pi a \sin(\theta_2)}{\lambda} \). ### Step 5: Simplify the Ratio As \( n \) increases, the intensity of the maxima decreases. The ratio of intensities of consecutive maxima can be approximated as: \[ \frac{I_n}{I_{n+1}} \approx \left( \frac{n}{n+1} \right)^2 \] This indicates that the intensity of the maxima decreases as we move to higher orders. ### Final Step: Conclusion Thus, the ratio of the intensities of consecutive maxima in the diffraction pattern due to a single slit is approximately: \[ \frac{I_n}{I_{n+1}} \approx \left( \frac{n}{n+1} \right)^2 \]

To find the ratio of the intensities of consecutive maxima in the diffraction pattern due to a single slit, we can follow these steps: ### Step 1: Understand the Diffraction Pattern The diffraction pattern produced by a single slit consists of a central maximum and several secondary maxima on either side. The intensity of these maxima decreases as we move away from the center. ### Step 2: Intensity Formula The intensity \( I \) of the maxima in a single slit diffraction pattern can be expressed using the formula: \[ ...
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • WAVE OPTICS

    A2Z|Exercise Polarisation Of Light|37 Videos
  • WAVE OPTICS

    A2Z|Exercise Problems Based On Different Concepts|39 Videos
  • WAVE OPTICS

    A2Z|Exercise Section D - Chapter End Test|29 Videos
  • SOURCE AND EFFECT OF MAGNETIC FIELD

    A2Z|Exercise Section D - Chapter End Test|30 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

The condition for obtaining maximum in the diffraction pattern due to a single slit is

The condition for obtaining secondary maxima in the diffraction pattern due to single slit is

In a single slit diffraction pattern

Central fringe obtained in diffraction pattern due to a single slit-

In single slit diffraction pattern :

The direction of the first secondary maximum in the fraunhoffer diffraction pattern at a single slit is given by (a is the width of the slit)

Direction of the first secondary maximum in the Fraunhofer diffraction pattern at a single slit is given by (a is the width of the slit)

The position of minima in the diffraction pattern due to a single slite are expressed by the formula

A2Z-WAVE OPTICS-Young'S Double Slit Experiment
  1. Light of wavelength 589.3nm is incident normally on the slit of width ...

    Text Solution

    |

  2. In a diffraction pattern by a wire, on increasing diameter of wire, fr...

    Text Solution

    |

  3. What will be the angular width of central maxima in Fraunhofer diffrac...

    Text Solution

    |

  4. If we observe the single slit Fraunhofer diffraction with wavelength l...

    Text Solution

    |

  5. A beam of light of wavelength 600nm from a distant source falls on a s...

    Text Solution

    |

  6. Direction of the first secondary maximum in the Fraunhofer diffraction...

    Text Solution

    |

  7. A parallel monochromatic beam of light is incident normally on a narro...

    Text Solution

    |

  8. A light wave is incident normally over a slit of width 24xx10^-5cm. Th...

    Text Solution

    |

  9. A parallel beam of monochromatic light of wavelength 5000Å is incident...

    Text Solution

    |

  10. In the far field diffraction pattern of a single slit under polychroma...

    Text Solution

    |

  11. Light of wavelength lambda=5000Å falls normally on a narrow slit. A sc...

    Text Solution

    |

  12. A single slit of width a is illuminated by violet light of wavelength ...

    Text Solution

    |

  13. In a single slit diffraction of light of wavelength lambda by a slit o...

    Text Solution

    |

  14. Angular width of central maxima in the Fraunhofer diffraction pattern ...

    Text Solution

    |

  15. In a single slit diffraction experiment first minimum for red light (6...

    Text Solution

    |

  16. The ratio of intensities of consecutive maxima in the diffraction patt...

    Text Solution

    |

  17. Light is incident normally on a diffraction grating through which the ...

    Text Solution

    |

  18. A beam of light of wavelength 600nm from a distance source falls on a ...

    Text Solution

    |

  19. A parallel beam of wavelength lambda=450xx10^9m passes through a long ...

    Text Solution

    |

  20. Given: width of aperture d=3mm and lambda=500nm. For what distance ray...

    Text Solution

    |