`PCl_5` in solid state exists as `PCl_4^+` and `PCl_6^-` Also in some solvents it undergoes dissoctation as ` 2PCl_5 hArr PCl_2^+ +PCl_6^-`.
The geometry and hybridisation of ` PCl_4^+` is :

PCl_5 in solid state exists as PCl_4^+ and PCl_6^- Also in some solvents it undergoes dissoctation as 2PCl_5 hArr PCl_2^+ +PCl_6^- . The geometry and hybridisation of PCl_6^- is :

PCl_5 in solid state exists as PCl_4^+ and PCl_6^- . Also in some solvents it undergoes dissoctation as 2PCl_5 hArr PCl_2^+ +PCl_6^- . The geometry and hybridisation of PCl_5 is :

PCl_5 in solid state exists as PCl_4^+ and PCl_6^- Also in some solvents it undergoes dissoctation as 2PCl_5 hArr PCl_2^+ +PCl_6^- . Which statement is wrong ?

PCl_(5) in solid state exists as PCl_(4)^(+) and PCl_(6)^(-) and also in some solvents it undergoes dissociation as 2PCl_(5) hArr PCl_(4)^(+) +PCl_(6)^(-) The geometry and hybridisation of PCl_(6)^(-) is

PCl_(5) in solid state exists as PCl_(4)^(+) and PCl_(6)^(-) and also in some solvents it undergoes dissociation as 2PCl_(5) hArr PCl_(4)^(+) +PCl_(6)^(-) The geometry and hydridisation of PCl_(4)^(+) is

PCl_5 in solid state exists as PCl_4^+ and PCl_6^- Also in some solvents it undergoes dissoctation as 2PCl_5 hArr PCl_2^+ +PCl_6^- . The van't Hoff factor for diassociation of PCl_5 is (if alpha is its degree of disssociation) :

PCl_5 in solid state exists as PCl_4^+ and PCl_6^- Also in some solvents it undergoes dissoctation as 2PCl_5 hArr PCl_2^+ +PCl_6^- . The oxidation number of P in PCl_5 .PCl_4^+ and PCl_6^- are respectively :

PCl_(5) in solid state exists as PCl_(4)^(+) and PCl_(6)^(-) and also in some solvents it undergoes dissociation as 2PCl_(5) hArr PCl_(4)^(+) +PCl_(6)^(-) Which statement is wrong ?

Shape and hybridisation of PCl_(6)^(-) is

Hybridisation of PCl_(5) solid is :