Home
Class 12
BIOLOGY
Assertion : Elimination of a competitive...

Assertion : Elimination of a competitively inferior species in a closely related or otherwise similar group is known as competitive exclusion principle.
Reason : If two species compete for the same resource, they could aviod competition by choosing different times for feeding or different foraging patterns.

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
### Step-by-Step Solution: 1. **Understanding the Assertion**: - The assertion states that the elimination of a competitively inferior species in a closely related or similar group is known as the Competitive Exclusion Principle. This principle suggests that two species competing for the same limited resources cannot coexist indefinitely; one will outcompete the other. 2. **Understanding the Reason**: - The reason provided states that if two species compete for the same resource, they can avoid competition by choosing different feeding times or different foraging patterns. This concept is related to resource partitioning, where species adapt to utilize resources in a way that minimizes competition. 3. **Evaluating the Assertion**: - The assertion is correct. The Competitive Exclusion Principle is a well-established ecological concept that describes how one species can outcompete another when they are vying for the same resources. 4. **Evaluating the Reason**: - The reason is also correct in that species can avoid direct competition through resource partitioning, which allows them to coexist by utilizing resources differently (e.g., different times or methods of feeding). 5. **Determining the Relationship**: - While both the assertion and reason are correct, the reason does not adequately explain the assertion. The Competitive Exclusion Principle specifically refers to the outcome of competition (elimination of one species), while the reason discusses a strategy (resource partitioning) that can help species coexist. 6. **Conclusion**: - Therefore, the assertion is true, the reason is true, but the reason does not correctly explain the assertion. The correct answer to the question is that both statements are correct, but the reason is not a valid explanation for the assertion. ### Final Answer: - The assertion is correct, and the reason is correct, but the reason does not explain the assertion. Thus, the answer is Option B.
### Step-by-Step Solution: 1. **Understanding the Assertion**: - The assertion states that the elimination of a competitively inferior species in a closely related or similar group is known as the Competitive Exclusion Principle. This principle suggests that two species competing for the same limited resources cannot coexist indefinitely; one will outcompete the other. 2. **Understanding the Reason**: - The reason provided states that if two species compete for the same resource, they can avoid competition by choosing different feeding times or different foraging patterns. This concept is related to resource partitioning, where species adapt to utilize resources in a way that minimizes competition. ...
Doubtnut Promotions Banner Mobile Dark
|

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • MOLECULAR BASIS OF INHERITANCE

    NCERT FINGERTIPS|Exercise Molecular Basis Of Inheritance|151 Videos

  • PRACTICE PAPERS

    NCERT FINGERTIPS|Exercise Practice paper|150 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

To avoid competition species choose different feeding time and different foraging pattern this is called

Two avoid the competitive exclusion principle two similar species live in same area, they may evolve to becomes more different in order to

Knowledge Check

  • If two species complete for the same resource, they could avoid competition by

    A
    Choosing different times for feeding
    B
    Different foraging pattern
    C
    Behavioural difference in their foraging activities
    D
    All of the above

  • Two species competing for the same resource can avoid competition by choosing different habits. This phenomenon is called _____and was supported by _____.

    A
    competitive exclusion, Gause
    B
    competitive exclusion, MacArthur
    C
    resource partitioning, Gause
    D
    resource partitioning, MacArthur

  • Competitive exclusion principle stating that inferior species is eliminated eventually after prologed competition was given by

    A
    Allen
    B
    Pearl-Verhulst
    C
    Gause
    D
    Darwin.

    • Similar Questions

    Explore conceptually related problems

    Assertion: Competition always occurs between closely related species complete for same resources that are limiting. Reason:- Totally unrelated species could not complete for same resources.

    Who showed that five closely related species of warblers living on the same tree were able to avoid competition and co-exist due to behavioural differences in their foraging activities?

    Statements I. Recent studies suport competition as suggested in 'Gause's competitive exclusion principle. II. Gause's hypothesis says if two species compete for same resources then one will be eliminated by another species III. More recent studies point out that species facing competition might evolve mechanism that promto co-existence rather than exclusion IV. Gause's competive exclusion principle is effective when resources are in excess V. Unlimited resources given better oppertunity for adaptation Choose the correct combination of statements

    Assertion: In Ophrys one petal of the flower bears an uncanny resemblance to the female bee. Reason: Two closely related species competing for the same resource can coexist simultaneously.

    which of the following states that too closely related species competing for the same resources cannot coexist indefinitely and the competitively inferior one will be eventually eliminated?

    Home
    Profile