The proposition ` ~p vv( p ^^ ~ q)` is equivalent to

The proposition p to ~ (p^^~ q) is equivalent to

(p ^^ q) vv ~ p is equivalent to

If the inverse of implication p rarr q is defined as ~p rarr ~q , then the inverse of the proposition (p ^^ ~q) rarr r is not equivalent to : I : ~r rarr p vv q II : ~p vv ~q rarr ~r III : r rarr p ^^ ~q The true statements in the above are :

The proposition (sim p)vv(p^(-)q) is equivalent to

~(pvvq)vv(~p^^q) is equivalent to

~(pvvq)vv(~p^^q) is equivalent to

~(pvvq)vv(~p^^q) is equivalent to

The proposition prarr~(p^^~q) is equivalent to :