Assertion : With the help of Gauss's theorm we can find electric field at any point.
Reason : Gauss's theorem can be applied for any type of charge distribution.

Options

A. If both Assertion and Reason are correct and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion
B. If both Assertion and Reason are correct but Reason is not the correct explanation of Assertion
C. If Assertion is true but Reason is false
D. If Assertion is false but Reason is true

Answer

To analyze the given statements regarding Gauss's theorem, we will break down the assertion and the reason step by step.

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Assertion:**
- The assertion states: "With the help of Gauss's theorem, we can find the electric field at any point."
- Gauss's theorem relates the electric flux through a closed surface to the charge enclosed by that surface. It is expressed mathematically as:
\[ \Phi_E = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{\epsilon_0} \]
- This theorem can indeed be used to find the electric field at various points, especially in cases with high symmetry (spherical, cylindrical, or planar symmetry).

2. **Analyzing the Reason:**
- The reason states: "Gauss's theorem can be applied for any type of charge distribution."
- While Gauss's theorem can be applied to any charge distribution theoretically, in practice, it is most useful for charge distributions that exhibit symmetry (like spherical, cylindrical, or planar symmetry).
- For arbitrary charge distributions, applying Gauss's theorem can become mathematically complex and may not yield a straightforward solution.

3. **Conclusion:**
- The assertion is true because Gauss's theorem allows us to find the electric field at points where symmetry is present.
- The reason is false because Gauss's theorem is not practically applicable to all types of charge distributions due to the complexity of calculations involved.

### Final Evaluation:
- The assertion is true, but the reason is false. Therefore, the correct conclusion is that the assertion is true, while the reason is not a valid explanation for the assertion.