Home
Class 11
CHEMISTRY
Opition in which shielding constant (Acc...

Opition in which shielding constant (According to Slater's rule ) is 0.85 by each electron in alll inner shell (s) :

A

For outer most electron of Li

B

For outer most electron of Na

C

Both (a) and (b)

D

None of these

Text Solution

Verified by Experts

The correct Answer is:
a

`Li to (1s^(2))(2s^(1))`
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • QUANTUM NUMBERS AND GENERAL CHEMISTRY

    GRB PUBLICATION|Exercise reasoning type|6 Videos
  • QUANTUM NUMBERS AND GENERAL CHEMISTRY

    GRB PUBLICATION|Exercise multiple objective type|29 Videos
  • QUANTUM NUMBERS AND GENERAL CHEMISTRY

    GRB PUBLICATION|Exercise E.|32 Videos
  • PRACTICAL ORGANIC CHEMISTRY

    GRB PUBLICATION|Exercise Exercise 4 (Matrix match type )|1 Videos
  • REDOX REACTIONS

    GRB PUBLICATION|Exercise All Questions|332 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

According to Slater's rule , correct order of Z_("eff") on valence shell electron is :

According to Chargaff’s rule, which one is correct?

According to Slater's rule, which of the following has correct order of Z_(eff) ?

The Z_("effective ") of 3^(rd) period element according to Slater's rule is : ( where n is the number of outermost shell electron )

Effective nuclear charge (Z_(eff)) is the net attractive force on electrons under consideration and is equal to: Z_(eff) = Z - sigma (nuclear charge - screening constant). Z_(eff) or sigma is calculated by Slater's formula, as given. If one electrons is present in the outermst orbit, there will be no screening in that orbital. Each electrons contribute, 0.35 (total electrons minus one electron) present in the outermost shell. A contribution of 0.85 for each electrons is taken in the (n - 1)th shell. Which of the following statement is wrong?

Effective nuclear charge (Z_(eff)) is the net attractive force on electrons under consideration and is equal to: Z_(eff) = Z - sigma (nuclear charge - screening constant). Z_(eff) or sigma is calculated by Slater's formula, as given. If one electrons is present in the outermst orbit, there will be no screening in that orbital. Each electrons contribute, 0.35 (total electrons minus one electron) present in the outermost shell. A contribution of 0.85 for each electrons is taken in the (n - 1)th shell. Which of the following statement is wrong?

Effective nuclear charge (Z_(eff)) is the net attractive force on electrons under consideration and is equal to: Z_(eff) = Z - sigma (nuclear charge - screening constant). Z_(eff) or sigma is calculated by Slater's formula, as given. If one electrons is present in the outermst orbit, there will be no screening in that orbital. Each electrons contribute, 0.35 (total electrons minus one electron) present in the outermost shell. A contribution of 0.85 for each electrons is taken in the (n - 1)th shell. The screening constant (sigma) for 4s electron of Mn (Z = 25) will be

J.C. Slater proposed an empirical constant that represents the cumulative extent to which the other electrons of an atom shield (or screen) any particular electron from the nuclear charge. Thus, slater's screening contant sigma is as : Z^(**)=Z-sigma Here, Z is the atomic number of the atom, and hence is equal to the actual number of protons in the atom. the parameter Z^(**) is the effective nuclear charge, which according to is smaller than Z, since the electron in question is screened (shielded) from Z by an amount sigma . Conversely, an electron that is well shielded from the nuclear charge Z experiences a small effective nuclear charge Z^(**) . The value of sigma for any one electron in a given electron configuration (i.e., in the presence of the other electrons of the atom in question) is calculated using a set of empirical rules developed by slater. according to these rules, the value of sigma for the electron in question is the cumulative total provided by the various other electrons of the atom. Q. According to Slater's rule, order of effective nuclear charge (Z^(**)) for last electron in case of Li, Na and K.