" The inverse of the proposition "(P^^sim q)rarr r" is "

The inverse of the proposition (p ^^ ~q) rarr r is

The inverse of the proposition (p ^^ ~q) rarr r is

The inverse of the proposition (p ^^ ~q) rarr r is

The inverse of the proposition (p ^^ ~q) rarr r is

The Inverse of the proposition (p ^^ ~~q)rarr r is:

If the inverse of implication p rarr q is defined as ~p rarr ~q , then the inverse of the proposition (p ^^ ~q) rarr r is not equivalent to : I : ~r rarr p vv q II : ~p vv ~q rarr ~r III : r rarr p ^^ ~q The true statements in the above are :

The inverse of the proposition (p ^^ ~q) to r is

The inverse of the proposition ( p ^^ ~ q) to s

The inverse of the proposition ( p ^^ ~ q) to s