Home
Class 12
MATHS
The statement phArr q is equal to -...

The statement `phArr q` is equal to -

A

`(~p vv q) vv (p vvq)`

B

`(p ^^q) vv (~p^^~q)`

C

`(~p vvq ) ^^ (p vv~q)`

D

`(p ^^q) vv (pvvq)`

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To solve the question regarding the statement "P by conditional Q," we will follow these steps: ### Step 1: Understand the biconditional statement The biconditional statement \( P \text{ by conditional } Q \) is denoted as \( P \iff Q \). This means that \( P \) is true if and only if \( Q \) is true. ### Step 2: Rewrite the biconditional statement The biconditional statement can be expressed in terms of implications: \[ P \iff Q \equiv (P \implies Q) \land (Q \implies P) \] This means that both implications must hold true for the biconditional to be true. ### Step 3: Express implications in terms of logical operations The implication \( P \implies Q \) can be rewritten using logical operations: \[ P \implies Q \equiv \neg P \lor Q \] Similarly, the implication \( Q \implies P \) can be rewritten as: \[ Q \implies P \equiv \neg Q \lor P \] ### Step 4: Combine the implications Now, substituting these expressions back into our biconditional statement, we get: \[ P \iff Q \equiv (\neg P \lor Q) \land (\neg Q \lor P) \] ### Step 5: Identify the equivalent expression The expression \( (\neg P \lor Q) \land (\neg Q \lor P) \) is the standard logical form for the biconditional. ### Conclusion Thus, the statement \( P \text{ by conditional } Q \) is equivalent to: \[ (\neg P \lor Q) \land (\neg Q \lor P) \]
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • MATHEMATICAL REASONING

    FIITJEE|Exercise EXERCISE 1|19 Videos
  • MATHEMATICAL REASONING

    FIITJEE|Exercise EXERCISE 2|23 Videos
  • MATHEMATICAL REASONING

    FIITJEE|Exercise SOLVED PROBLEMS (OBJECTIVE)|7 Videos
  • INDEFINTE INTEGRAL

    FIITJEE|Exercise EXERCISE-8|1 Videos
  • MATHEMATICS

    FIITJEE|Exercise NUMERICAL DECIMAL BASED QUESTIONS|15 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

The statement phArr q is not equivalent to

The statement ~(phArr q) is not equivalent to

The statement (~(phArr q))^^p is equivalent to

The statement prArr(q^^p) is negation of the statement

~(p ^^ q) is equal to-

The statement ~(pharr~ q) is (1) equivalent to pharrq (2) equivalent to ~ pharrq (3) a tautology (4) a fallacy

For two statements p and q, the statement ~(pvv(~q)) is equivalent to