A: The induced current flows so as to oppose the cause producing it.
R: Lenz's law is based on energy conservation.

Options

A. If both Assertion & Reason are true and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.
B. If both Assertion & Reason are true but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.
C. If Assertion is true statement but Reason is false.
D. If both Assertion and Reason are false statements.

Answer

To solve the question, we need to analyze both the assertion (A) and the reason (R) provided.

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Assertion (A)**:
- The assertion states that "The induced current flows so as to oppose the cause producing it."
- This is a direct reference to Lenz's Law, which states that the direction of induced current is such that it creates a magnetic field that opposes the change in magnetic flux that produced it.

2. **Understanding the Reason (R)**:
- The reason states that "Lenz's law is based on energy conservation."
- This is true because Lenz's Law is indeed derived from the principle of conservation of energy. When an induced current flows, it requires work to be done against the induced magnetic field, which relates to the energy conservation principle.

3. **Analyzing the Relationship**:
- Both the assertion and reason are correct statements.
- However, the reason does not directly explain the assertion. While Lenz's law is based on energy conservation, the assertion specifically addresses the direction of induced current, which is a consequence of Lenz's law.

4. **Conclusion**:
- Since both statements are true, but the reason does not adequately explain the assertion, the correct answer is that both A and R are true, but R does not explain A.

### Final Answer:
Both assertion and reason are correct, but the reason does not explain the assertion.

---