A: Faraday's law is an experimental law. R: Time varying magnetic field cannot generate induced emf.

Options

A. If both Assertion & Reason are true and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.
B. If both Assertion & Reason are true but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion.
C. If Assertion is true statement but Reason is false.
D. If both Assertion and Reason are false statements.

Answer

To analyze the given statements, we will break down the assertion (A) and reasoning (R) and evaluate their validity step by step.

### Step 1: Understand the Assertion (A)
The assertion states that "Faraday's law is an experimental law."

**Explanation**:
Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction is indeed based on experimental observations. It describes how a change in magnetic flux through a circuit induces an electromotive force (EMF) in that circuit. This law was formulated based on various experiments conducted by Michael Faraday in the 19th century, demonstrating that a changing magnetic field can induce an electric current.

### Step 2: Understand the Reasoning (R)
The reasoning states that "A time varying magnetic field cannot generate induced EMF."

**Explanation**:
This statement is incorrect. In fact, a time-varying magnetic field is precisely what generates induced EMF according to Faraday's law. Faraday's law states that the induced EMF in a closed loop is equal to the negative rate of change of magnetic flux through the loop. Therefore, if the magnetic field is changing with time, it will lead to a change in magnetic flux, which in turn induces an EMF.

### Step 3: Conclusion
Now, we can conclude the validity of both statements:
- The assertion (A) is **True**: Faraday's law is indeed an experimental law.
- The reasoning (R) is **False**: A time-varying magnetic field **can** generate induced EMF.

### Final Answer:
- Assertion (A) is true.
- Reasoning (R) is false.