No physicist has ever "seen" an electron, yet, all physicists believe in existence of electrons . An intelligent but superstitious man advances this analog to argure that 'ghosts' exist even though no one has "seen" one . How will you refute his argument ?

Explanation

To refute the argument that the existence of ghosts is comparable to the existence of electrons, we can follow these steps:

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Basis of Belief**:
- Begin by acknowledging that while no physicist has "seen" an electron, their existence is supported by extensive scientific evidence and experimentation.
- Electrons are fundamental particles that are part of the atomic structure, and their behavior can be observed indirectly through various experiments.

...