Home
Class 11
CHEMISTRY
Assertion: In 0.1 M HCl , [H^+] is also...

Assertion: In 0.1 M HCl , `[H^+]` is also equal to 0.1 M but in 0.1 M `CH_3COOH, [H^+]` is not equal to 01 M.
Reason: HCl is completely ionized but `CH_3COOH` does not ionize completely.

A

Assertion and reason both are correct statements and Reason is correct explanation for assertion.

B

Assertion and reason both are correct statement but reason is not correct explanation for assertion

C

Assertion is correct statement but reason is wrong statement.

D

Assertion is wrong statement but reason is correct statement

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To solve the given assertion and reason question, we will analyze the statements step by step. ### Step-by-Step Solution: 1. **Understanding the Assertion**: - The assertion states that in a 0.1 M HCl solution, the concentration of hydrogen ions \([H^+]\) is equal to 0.1 M. In contrast, in a 0.1 M acetic acid (\(CH_3COOH\)) solution, the concentration of \([H^+]\) is not equal to 0.1 M. 2. **Analyzing HCl**: - HCl is a strong acid. Strong acids completely dissociate in water. This means that if you have 0.1 M HCl, it will dissociate completely into hydrogen ions and chloride ions: \[ HCl \rightarrow H^+ + Cl^- \] - Therefore, for every mole of HCl, you get one mole of \(H^+\). Hence, in a 0.1 M HCl solution, \([H^+] = 0.1 \, M\). 3. **Analyzing Acetic Acid (\(CH_3COOH\))**: - Acetic acid is a weak acid. Weak acids do not completely dissociate in water. The dissociation of acetic acid can be represented as: \[ CH_3COOH \rightleftharpoons H^+ + CH_3COO^- \] - The double arrow indicates that the dissociation is reversible and does not go to completion. Therefore, not all of the acetic acid will dissociate into \(H^+\) ions. 4. **Concentration of \([H^+]\) in Acetic Acid**: - In a 0.1 M solution of acetic acid, only a fraction of it will dissociate into \(H^+\) ions. The actual concentration of \([H^+]\) will be less than 0.1 M because only a small portion of the acetic acid molecules ionize. 5. **Conclusion**: - The assertion is correct because \([H^+]\) in 0.1 M HCl is indeed 0.1 M, while in 0.1 M \(CH_3COOH\), \([H^+]\) is less than 0.1 M. - The reason is also correct as it explains that HCl is a strong acid that completely ionizes, while \(CH_3COOH\) is a weak acid that does not ionize completely. ### Final Statement: Both the assertion and the reason are correct, and the reason correctly explains the assertion. ---
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • EQUILIBRIUM

    MODERN PUBLICATION|Exercise Revision Exercise (Very short )|35 Videos
  • EQUILIBRIUM

    MODERN PUBLICATION|Exercise Revision Exercise ( short )|44 Videos
  • EQUILIBRIUM

    MODERN PUBLICATION|Exercise Revision Exercise (Fill in the blanks)|14 Videos
  • ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION

    MODERN PUBLICATION|Exercise UNIT PRACTICE TEST|15 Videos
  • HALOALKANES AND HALOARENES

    MODERN PUBLICATION|Exercise UNIT PRACTICE TEST|12 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

The pH of a mixture of 0.01 M HCI and 0.1 M CH_3COOH is approximately

Assertion (A ) : pH value of 0.1 M CH_(3)COOH is more than one. Reason (R ) : CH_(3)COOH is weakly ionised.

The pH of 0.1 M solution of CH_(3)COOH if it ionizes to an extent of 1% is .

The pH of a 0.1 M CH_(3)COOH which is 2% ionised in aqueous solution is

Calculate the pH at the equivalence point when a solution of 0.01 M CH_3COOH is titrated with a solution of 0.01 M NaOH. pK_a of CH_3COOH is 4.74.

An aqueous solution of 0.01 M CH_(3) COOH has van't Hoff factor 1.01 . If pH = - "log"[H^(+)] , pH of 0.01 M CH_(3)COOH solution would be :