Assertion : A substance which gets reduced can act as reducing agent.
Reason : As oxidising agent itself gets reduced.

Options

A. Assertion and reason both are correct statements and reason is correct explanation for assertion.
B. Assertion and reason both are correct statements but reason is not correct explanation for assertion.
C. Assertion is correct statement but reason is wrong statement.
D. Assertion is wrong statement but reason is correct statement.

Answer

To solve the question regarding the assertion and reason, we will analyze both statements step by step.

### Step 1: Understanding the Assertion
The assertion states: "A substance which gets reduced can act as a reducing agent."

- In a redox (reduction-oxidation) reaction, one substance is reduced (gains electrons) while another is oxidized (loses electrons).
- The substance that gets reduced donates electrons to another substance, thus facilitating the oxidation of that substance.
- Therefore, a substance that gets reduced does not act as a reducing agent; it is actually an oxidizing agent because it causes another substance to be oxidized.

### Step 2: Understanding the Reason
The reason states: "As oxidizing agent itself gets reduced."

- An oxidizing agent is defined as a substance that gains electrons in a chemical reaction and, in doing so, causes another substance to be oxidized.
- This statement is correct because the oxidizing agent indeed gets reduced during the reaction.

### Step 3: Evaluating the Assertion and Reason
- The assertion is incorrect because a substance that gets reduced cannot act as a reducing agent; it acts as an oxidizing agent.
- The reason is correct because it accurately describes the behavior of an oxidizing agent.

### Conclusion
Based on the analysis:
- The assertion is false.
- The reason is true.

Thus, the correct answer is that the assertion is wrong, but the reason is correct.

### Final Answer
Assertion is a wrong statement, but reason is a correct statement.

---