Assertion: Benzene does not give electrophilic substition reactions.
Reason: Benzene ring has extraordinarily stability because of delocalisation of six `pi`-electrons of three double bonds.

Options

A. Assertion and reason both are correct statements and reason is correct explanation for assertion.
B. Assertion and reagon both are correct statements but reason is not correct explanation for assertion.
C. Assertion is correct statement, but reason is wrong statement.
D. Assertion is wrong statement but reason is correct statement.

Answer

To analyze the assertion and reason provided in the question, we will break down the statements and evaluate their validity step by step.

### Step 1: Understanding the Assertion
The assertion states: "Benzene does not give electrophilic substitution reactions."

- **Evaluation**: This statement is **incorrect**. Benzene is known to undergo electrophilic substitution reactions. For example, reactions such as nitration, sulfonation, and halogenation are classic examples of electrophilic substitution reactions involving benzene. In these reactions, a hydrogen atom on the benzene ring is replaced by an electrophile.

### Step 2: Understanding the Reason
The reason states: "Benzene ring has extraordinary stability because of the delocalization of six π-electrons of three double bonds."

- **Evaluation**: This statement is **correct**. Benzene has a unique structure where the π-electrons are delocalized over the entire ring structure, leading to increased stability. This delocalization can be represented by resonance structures, which show that the electrons are not confined to specific double bonds but are spread out across the ring. This stability is a key factor in benzene’s ability to undergo electrophilic substitution reactions.

### Step 3: Conclusion
Based on the evaluations:

- The assertion is **incorrect**.
- The reason is **correct**.

Thus, the final conclusion is that the assertion is wrong, but the reason is correct.

### Final Answer
The correct option is: **Assertion is wrong, but reason is correct.**

---