The statement `(a+i b)<(c+i d)` is true for `a^2+b^2=0` (b) `b^2+d^2=0` `b^2+c^2=0` (d) None of these

Statement - I : The statement that circumradius and inradius of a triangle are 12 and 8 respectively can not be correct.. Because : Statement - II : Circumradius geq2 (inradius) A (b) B (c) C (d) D

One/ Two Statement(s) is/are given following by two Conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statement(s) to be true, even if it/they seem(s) to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statement(s). Statements : I. Vitamin B-complex is good for health. II. Fruits contain B-complex. Conclusions : I. We should grow fruits. II. Fruits are good for health.

Let Aa n dB be two 2xx2 matrices. Consider the statements (i) A B=O => A=O or B=O (ii)A B=I_2 => A=B^(-1) (iii) (A+B)^2=A^2+2A B+B^2 (i) and (ii) are false, (iii) is true (ii) and (iii) are false, (i) is true (i) is false (ii) and, (iii) are true (i) and (iii) are false, (ii) is true

Direction: Four statements are given below at A, B, C and D. There may be some errors in the given statements. Mark the incorrect statement as the answer. If all the statements are incorrect, mark E i.e. All are incorrect as the answer.

Pick up the correct statement: (A) - I effect stabilizes carbocation (B) +I effect stabilizes carbanion (C) +I effect stabilizes carbocation (D) -I effect destabilizes carbanion

Statement I is True: Statement II is True; Statement II is a correct explanation for statement I Statement I is true, Statement II is true; Statement II not a correct explanation for statement I. Statement I is true, statement II is false Statement I is false, statement II is true Let f: R->R [0,\ pi//2] defined by f(x)=tan^(-1)(x^2+x+a) , then Statement I: The set of values of a for which f(x) is onto is [1/4,oo) because Statement II: Minimum value of x^2+x+a\ i s\ a-1/4dot a. A b. \ B c. \ C d. D

Statement I is True: Statement II is True; Statement II is a correct explanation for statement I Statement I is true, Statement II is true; Statement II not a correct explanation for statement I. Statement I is true, statement II is false Statement I is false, statement II is true Statement I: cos e s^(-1)(cos e c9/5)=pi-9/5dot because Statement II: cos e c^(-1)(cos e c x)=pi-x :\ AAx in [pi/2,(3pi)/2]-{pi} a. A b. \ B c. \ C d. D

Statement 1 is True: Statement 2 is True; Statement 2 is a correct explanation for statement 1 Statement 1 is true, Statement 2 is true;2 Statement 2 not a correct explanation for statement 1. Statement 1 is true, statement 2 is false Statement 1 is false, statement 2 is true Statement I: If A is obtuse angle I A B C , then tanB\ t a n C<1 because Statement II: In A B C ,\ t a n A=(t a n B+t a n C)/(t a n B t a n C-1)\ a. A b. \ B c. \ C d. D