Home
Class 12
CHEMISTRY
Mulliken defined the electronegativity o...

Mulliken defined the electronegativity of an atom as the arithmetic mean of its ionisation energy and electron affinity.
`X_(A)=(1)/(2)(I.P.+E.A.)`
One more relationship given by him, if the values are given in eV is
`X_(A)=("Ionisation potential"+ "Electron affinity")/(5.6)`
When there is pure covalent bond between A-B
`((IP)_(A)+(EA)_(A))/(5.6)=((IP)_(B)+(EA)_(B))/(5.6)`
`implies X_(A)=X_(B)`
According to Mulliken, electronegativity depends on

Promotional Banner

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Mulliken defined the electronegativity of an atom as the arithmetic mean of its ionisation energy and electron affinity. X_(A)=(1)/(2)(I.P.+E.A.) One more relationship given by him, if the values are given in eV is X_(A)=("Ionisation potential"+ "Electron affinity")/(5.6) When there is pure covalent bond between A-B ((IP)_(A)+(EA)_(A))/(5.6)=((IP)_(B)+(EA)_(B))/(5.6) implies X_(A)=X_(B) Pauling's Electronegativity scale is based on

Mulliken defined the electronegativity of an atom as the arithmetic mean of its ionisation energy and electron affinity. X_(A)=(1)/(2)(I.P.+E.A.) One more relationship given by him, if the values are given in eV is X_(A)=("Ionisation potential"+ "Electron affinity")/(5.6) When there is pure covalent bond between A-B ((IP)_(A)+(EA)_(A))/(5.6)=((IP)_(B)+(EA)_(B))/(5.6) implies X_(A)=X_(B) Pauling's Electronegativity scale is based on

Mulliken defined the electronegativity of an atom as the arithmetic mean of its ionisation energy and electron affinity. X_(A)=(1)/(2)(I.P.+E.A.) One more relationship given by him, if the values are given in eV is X_(A)=("Ionisation potential"+ "Electron affinity")/(5.6) When there is pure covalent bond between A-B ((IP)_(A)+(EA)_(A))/(5.6)=((IP)_(B)+(EA)_(B))/(5.6) implies X_(A)=X_(B) When there is formation of overset(delta-)(A)-overset(delta+)(B) bond then condition will be

Mulliken defined the electronegativity of an atom as the arithmetic mean of its ionisation energy and electron affinity. X_(A)=(1)/(2)(I.P.+E.A.) One more relationship given by him, if the values are given in eV is X_(A)=("Ionisation potential"+ "Electron affinity")/(5.6) When there is pure covalent bond between A-B ((IP)_(A)+(EA)_(A))/(5.6)=((IP)_(B)+(EA)_(B))/(5.6) implies X_(A)=X_(B) When there is formation of overset(delta-)(A)-overset(delta+)(B) bond then condition will be

For the reaction K(g)+F(g) +K^(o+)+F^(Theta) (separated ions DeltaH = 19 kcal mol^(-1) ), if the ionisation potential of K and the electron affinity of F^(Theta) have a geometric means of 3.88eV and IP gt EA , calculate the values fo ionisation potential and electron affinity.

For the reaction K(g)+F(g) +K^(o+)+F^(Theta) (separated ions DeltaH = 19 kcal mol^(-1) ), if the ionisation potential of K and the electron affinity of F^(Theta) have a geometric means of 3.88eV and IP gt EA , calculate the values fo ionisation potential and electron affinity.

Let electronegativity, ionisation energy and electron affinity by represented as EN, IP and EA respectively. Which one of the following equation is correct according to Mulliken ?

Let electronegativity, ionisation energy and electron affinity be represented as EN, IP and EA respectively. Which one of the following equation is correct according to Mulliken?

Statement-1: Down the group, electronegativity decreases from B to TI. Statement-2: Electronegativity of an element depends on its electron affinity and ionisation energy.