Assertion: `C_(6)H_(5)CI` on treating with `NaOH` does not show replacement of `CI` atom by `OH`
Reason: The resonance in chlorobenzene stabilizen the molecule .

C_(6)H_(6)CI_(6) on treatment with alcoholic KOH yields .

Assertion (A) : It is difficult to replace chlorine by -OH in chlorobenzene in comparison to that in chlorobenzene in comaparision to that in chloroethane. Reason (R) : Chlorine-carbon (C-Cl) bond in chlorobenzene has partial double bond character due to resonance.

Assertion: C_(2)H_(5)O is more reactive than C_(2)H_(5)CI . Reason: I being less electronegative than CI.

Assertion: It is difficult to replace chlorine by -OH in chlorobenzene in comparison to that in chloroethane Reason: Chlorine-carbon (C-Cl) bond in chlorobenzene has a partial double bond character due to resonance.

Assertion: It is difficult to replace chlorine by -OH in chlorobenzene in comparison to that in chloroethane Reason: Chlorine-carbon (C-Cl) bond in chlorobenzene has a partial double bond character due to resonance.

C_(6)H_(5)N_(2)CI overset(KI)(to) This reaction is named as

Assertion : C_(6)H_(6) does not decolourize Br_(2) water. Reason : All the six carbon atoms have delocalized pi- electrons.

Assertion: C CI_(3)CHO froms an isolable crystaline hydrate. Reason : Electron withdrawing chlorine atoms stabilise liydrate by intramolecular H-bonding.

C_(6)H_(5) OH and C_(6) H_(5) COOH show difference in the reaction with

C_(6)H_(5) OH and C_(6) H_(5) COOH show difference in the reaction with