Assertion: High yielding variety of rice was produced in India by introduction of dwarfing genes called Dee-goo-woo-gen from Taiwan.
Reason: High yielding variety of wheat was produced from dwarfing genes of Norin-10 from Japan in India.

Options

A. If both Assertion and Reason are true and Reason is a correct explanation of the Assertion.
B. If both Assertion and Reason are true but Reason is not a correct explanation of the Assertion.
C. If Assertion is true but Reason is talse.
D. If both Assertion and Reason are false.

Answer

To solve the question regarding the assertion and reason, we can follow these steps:

### Step 1: Analyze the Assertion
The assertion states that a high yielding variety of rice was produced in India by the introduction of dwarfing genes called Dee-goo-woo-gen from Taiwan.

- **Evaluation**: This statement is true. The dwarfing gene referred to here is indeed associated with high yielding varieties of rice, and the SD1 gene, which is derived from the Dee-goo-woo-gen, has been instrumental in developing these varieties in India.

### Step 2: Analyze the Reason
The reason states that a high yielding variety of wheat was produced from dwarfing genes of Norin-10 from Japan in India.

- **Evaluation**: This statement is also true. Norin-10 is a semi-dwarf wheat variety that has contributed to the development of high yielding wheat varieties in India.

### Step 3: Determine the Relationship
Now, we need to determine if the reason provided is a correct explanation for the assertion.

- **Evaluation**: While both statements are true, the reason does not explain the assertion. The assertion is specifically about rice and the dwarfing gene from Taiwan, while the reason discusses wheat and a different dwarfing gene from Japan. Therefore, the reason does not provide a correct explanation for the assertion.

### Step 4: Conclusion
Based on the evaluations:
- Both the assertion and the reason are true.
- However, the reason is not a correct explanation of the assertion.

Thus, the correct answer is that both assertion and reason are true, but the reason is not a correct explanation of the assertion.

### Final Answer
Both assertion and reason are true, but reason is not a correct explanation of assertion.

---