Magnetization of a sample is

What do you understand by the 'magnetization' of a sample ?

Would the maximum possible magnetization of a paramagnetic sample be of the same order of magnitude as the magnetization of a ferromagnet?

A: The maximum possible magnetization of a paramagnetic sample is of the same order of magnitude as the magnetization of a ferromagnet. R: Saturation of paramagnetic substnaces requires imparactically high magnetising fields.

A: The maximum possible magnetization of a paramagnetic sample is of the same order of magnitude as the magnetization of a ferromagnet. R: Saturation of paramagnetic substnaces requires imparactically high magnetising fields.

If M_(z) = magnetisation of paramagnetic sample B= external magnetic field T= absolute temperature, C= curie constant then according to Curie's law in magnetism, the correct relation is

Answer the following questions: (a) Why does a paramagnetic sample display greater magnetization (for the same magnetizing field) when cooled. (b) Why is diamagnetism, in contrast, almost independent of temperature? (c) If a toroid uses bismuth for its core, will the field in the core be (slightly) greater or (slightly) less than when the core is empty? (d) Is the permeability of a ferromagnetic material independent of the magnetic field? If not, is it more for lower or higher fields? (e) Magnetic field lines are always nearly normal to the surface of a ferromagnet at every point (This fact is analogous to the static electric field lines being normal to the surface of a conductor at every point). Why? (f) Would the maximum possible magnetization of a paramagnetic sample be of the same order of magnitude as the magnetization of a ferromagnet?

A paramagnetic sample shows a net magnetization of 8 Am^(-1) when placed in an external magnetic field of 0.6 T at a temperature of 4 K When the same sample is placed in an external magnetic field of 0.2 T at a temperature of 16 K, the magnetization will be