Home
Class 12
CHEMISTRY
In terms of CFT explain why a d^(9) octa...

In terms of `CFT` explain why a `d^(9)` octahedral complex with six identical ligands is not expected tom have all size `m-L` distane identical .

Promotional Banner

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Velence bond theroy describes the bonding in complexs in terms of coordinate -covalent bond resulting from overlap filled ligand orbitals with vacant metal hybrid orbitals This theory explains magnetic behaviour and geometrical shape of coordination compounds Magnetic moment of a complex compound can be determined experimentally and theoretically by using spin only formula Magnetic moment sqrtn (n+2)BM (where n = No. unpaired electrons) . The value of of spin only magnetic moment for octahedral complex of the following configuration is 2.84BM The correct statement is (a) d^(4) (in weak field ligand) (b) d^(2) (in weak field and in strong field ligand) (c) d^(3) (in weak field and in strong field ligand) (d) d^(5) (in strong field ligand) .

Velence bond theroy describes the bonding in complexs in terms of coordinate -covalent bond resulting from overlap filled ligand orbitals with vacant metal hybrid orbitals This theory explains magnetic behaviour and geometrical shape of coordination compounds Magnetic moment of a complex compound can be determined experimentally and theoretically by using spin only formula Magnetic moment sqrtn (n+2)BM (where n = No. unpaired electrons) . The value of of spin only magnetic moment for octahedral complex of the following configuration is 2.84BM The correct statement is (a) d^(4) (in weak field ligand) (b) d^(2) (in weak field and in strong field ligand) (c) d^(3) (in weak field and in strong field ligand) (d) d^(5) (in strong field ligand) .

When degenerate d-orbitals of an isolated atom/ion come under influence of magnetic field of ligands, the degeneray is lost. The two set t_(2g)(d_(xy),d_(yz),d_(xz)) and e_(g) (d_(x^(2))-d_(x^(2)-y^(2)) are either stabilized or destabilized depending upon the nature of magnetic field. it can be expressed diagrammatically as: Value of CFSE depends upon nature of ligand and a spectrochemical series has been made experimentally, for tetrahedral complexes, Delta is about 4/9 times to Delta_(0) (CFSE for octahedral complex). this energy lies in visible region and i.e., why electronic transition are responsible for colour. such transition are not possible with d^(0) and d^(10) configuration. Q. Ti^(3+)(aq) . is purple while Ti^(4+)(aq) . is colourless because:

When degenerate d-orbitals of an isolated atom/ion come under influence of magnetic field of ligands, the degeneray is lost. The two set t_(2g)(d_(xy),d_(yz),d_(xz)) and e_(g) (d_(x^(2))-d_(x^(2)-y^(2)) are either stabilized or destabilized depending upon the nature of magnetic field. it can be expressed diagrammatically as: Value of CFSE depends upon nature of ligand and a spectrochemical series has been made experimentally, for tetrahedral complexes, Delta is about 4/9 times to Delta_(0) (CFSE for octahedral complex). this energy lies in visible region and i.e., why electronic transition are responsible for colour. such transition are not possible with d^(0) and d^(10) configuration. Q. Ti^(3+)(aq) . is purple while Ti^(4+)(aq) . is colourless because:

When degenerate d-orbitals of an isolated atom/ion come under influence of magnetic field of ligands, the degeneray is lost. The two set t_(2g)(d_(xy),d_(yz),d_(xz)) and e_(g) (d_(x^(2))-d_(x^(2)-y^(2)) are either stabilized or destabilized depending upon the nature of magnetic field. it can be expressed diagrammatically as: Value of CFSE depends upon nature of ligand and a spectrochemical series has been made experimentally, for tetrahedral complexes, Delta is about 4/9 times to Delta_(0) (CFSE for octahedral complex). this energy lies in visible region and i.e., why electronic transition are responsible for colour. such transition are not possible with d^(0) and d^(10) configuration. Q. Ti^(3+)(aq) . is purple while Ti^(4+)(aq) . is colourless because: