"The size of a territory and per capital income are not directly related to human development." Support the statement with examples.

Explanation

The size of the territory and per capital income are not directly related to human development:
Often smaller countries have done better than larger ones in human development, Similarly, relatively poorer nations have been ranked higher than richer ncighbours in terms of human development
For example Sri Lanka, Trinidad and Tobago have a higher rank than India in the human development index despite having smaller economies. Similarly, within India, Kerala performs much better than Punjab and Gujarat in human development despite having lower per capital income.