In the the following question a part of the sentence is given in bond, it is then followed by three sentences which try to explain the meaning of the phrase given in bold. Choose the best set of alternatives from the five options given below each question which explains the meaning of the phrase correctly without altering the meaning of the sentence given as question.
The trial began only in 1996 and a couple of years ago all accused were cleared of all charges by a trial court in what activists have called a grave miscarriage of justice.
All accused involved in the case were cleared of all charges by a trial court in 1996 and that is what activists have called a complete failure of justice in prevailing the truth.
In 1996, by letting go all accused by clearing all charges against them, the trial court once again proved the incompetence of judicial system in justifying the truth.
Activists have felt that the decision by trial court in 1996 of clearing of all the charges against the accused is a serious negligence of true justice by the system.

Options

A. Only (I) is correct
B. Only (ii) is correct
C. Both (I) and (II) are correct
D. None is correct

Explanation

The phrase used in the sentence " a grave miscarriage of jsutice" means a wrong decision made by a court, as a result of which an innocent person is punished. In this case. It means a wrong decision made by a court which failed in justifying the actual truth, as result of which innocent person failed to get the jsutice. Hence, all three statements (I), (II) and (III) define the same meaning. So, (e) is the correct choice.