Statement I: In the meter bridge experiment shown in figure, the balance length AC corresponding to null deflection of the galvanometer is x. If the radius of the wire AB is doubled, the balanced length becomes 4x.
Statement II: The resistance of a wire is inversely proportional to the square of its radius.

STATEMENT-1 : In the meter bridge experimeter shown in figure the balance length AC corresponding to null deflection of the galvanometer is x. If the radius of the wire AB is doubled, the balance length becomes 4x. and STATEMENT-2 : The resistance of a wire a inversely proportional to the square of its radius.

Assertion: In a meter bridge experiment, the balancing length AC corresponding to null deflection of the galvanometer is x. If the radius of the wire AB is doubled then the balanced length becomes 4x. Reason: The resistance of a wire is inversel proportional to the square of its radius. Which one of the following statement is correct?

In the shows arrangement of a meter bridge, if AC corresponding to null deflection of galvanometer is x, what would be its value if the radius of the wire AB is doubled?

In the shows arrangement of a meter bridge, if AC corresponding to null deflection of galvanometer is x, what would be its value if the radius of the wire AB is doubled?

In the meter bridge circuit shown in figure- 3.281 find the length AC at null deflection in galvanometer.

In the shown arrangement of the experiment of the meter bridge if AC corresponding to null deflection of galvanometer is x, what would be its value if the radius of the wire AB is doubled?

In the shown arrangement of the experiment of the meter bridge if AC corresponding to null deflection of galvanometer is x, what would be its value if the radius of the wire AB is doubled?

In the shown arrangement of the experiment of the meter bridge if AC corroesponding to null deflection of galvanometer is x, what would be its value if the radius of the wire AB is doubled? .