Answer the following questions, which help you understand the difference between Thomson’s model and Rutherford’s model better.
(a) Is the average angle of deflection of -particles by a thin gold foil predicted by Thomson’s model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford’s model?
(b) Is the probability of backward scattering (i.e., scattering of `alpha`-particles at angles greater than `90°`) predicted by Thomson’s model much less, about the same, or much greater than that predicted by Rutherford’s model?
(c) Keeping other factors fixed, it is found experimentally that for small thickness t, the number of `alpha`-particles scattered at moderate angles is proportional to t. What clue does this linear dependence on t provide?
(d) In which model is it completely wrong to ignore multiple scattering for the calculation of average angle of scattering of `alpha` -particles by a thin foil?

Explanation

In Thomson model, positive charge is distributed uniforinly in the atom. So single collision causes very little deflection The observed average scattering angle can be explained only by considering multiple scattering. Hence it is wrong to ignore multiple scattering in Thomson.s model.