Home
Class 12
BIOLOGY
A: Cattle or goat never graze on Calotro...

A: Cattle or goat never graze on Calotropis.
R: Thorms are present as a morphological means of defence.

A

If both Assertion & Reason are true and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion

B

It both Assertion & Reason are true but the reason is not the correct explanation of the assertion

C

If Assertion is true statement but Reason is false

D

If both Assertion and Reason are false statements

Text Solution

Verified by Experts

The correct Answer is:
C
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • ORGANISMS AND POPULATIONS

    AAKASH INSTITUTE|Exercise ASSIGNMENT (SECTION-C) (Previous Years Questions)|66 Videos

  • NEURAL CONTROL AND COORDINATION

    AAKASH INSTITUTE|Exercise Assignment SECTION - D (Assertion-Reason Type Questions )|10 Videos

  • PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN HIGHER PLANTS

    AAKASH INSTITUTE|Exercise Assignment(section D)|10 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

Cattle or goats are never browsing on calotropis growing in abandoned fields because of the presence of

Cattle and goat refrain form feeding on the weed Calotropis because

Assertion (A): Innate immunity is non-specific type of defence present at the time of birth. Reason (R): Saliva, tears and sweat act as physiological barriers for innate immunity.

S_(1) : Entreainment televeised into people homes has specieal difficulies to overcome. S_(6) : The size of the screen also alters the nature of the presentation. P : There is no mass excitement, no real tension for the curtain to rise. Q : The show must conquer the dispersed, unkeyed attention of people at home. R : There is no means of condition to m ake the adience receptive, as they are in a theatre or a cinema. S : It is, of course, quite capable of doing this, but hte techniques of writng and production must take accound of their limiatations. Which one of the following is the correct sequence?

Mankind's experience of various evolutionary changes from primitive times to the present day has been extensive and varied. However, man's problems were never before as complicated as they seem to be today, Man's economic activity centres primarily around production, Labour is said to be the primary factor of production, its role, therefore, has been given a lot of importance. It should be useful to have an overall view of the economic history of man-from the nomadic times to the modern factory system and study its relevance to the various labour problems of today. Initially, man passed through the hunting and fishing stage'. During this period, his basic needs were adequately met by Nature. Wild animals, birds and fruits satisfied his hunger, and his thirst was quenched by the waters of springs and rivers, Caves gave him shelter and barks of trees were used as clothing. During this stage of man's progress, labour problems did not exist because of the absence of any economic, political and social systems. Then came the pastoral stage', which was marked by a certain amount of economic activity. The nomadic and migratory nature of man persisted, and, together with his goats and cattle, he moved on to fresh pastures and meadows. Some conflicts would sometimes take place among herd-owners, for, during this period, the institution of nominal private property ownership was not known. This stage paves the way for the agricultural stage', during which the class system began to develop. There was a small artisan class mostly self-employed, and there were also landed proprietors or Zamindars as well as slaves. Thus, arose the feudal system. During the fourth stage of these developments, the handicrafts stage', a number of social and economic changes took place which marked the beginning of the labour problem in the world. The self-sufficient economy of the village underwent a drastic change. The community of traders and merchants emerged. ."man's problems were never before as complicated as they seem to be today" means

It is a strange that, according to his position in life, an extravagant man is admired or despised. A successful businessman does nothing to increase his popularity by being careful with his money. He is expected to display his success, to have smart car, an expensive life, and to be lavish with his hospitality. If he is not so, he is considered mean and his reputation in business may even suffer in consequence. The paradox remains that if he had not been careful with his money in the first place, he would never have achieved his present wealth. Among the two income groups, a different set of values exists. The yaung clerk who makes his wife a present bf a new dress when the hadn't paid his houserent condemned as extravagant. Carefulness with money to the point of meanness is applauded as a virtue. Nothing in his life is considered inore worthy than paying his bills. The ideal wife for such a man separaters her housekeeping money into joyless little piles- so much for rent, for food, for the children's shoes, she is able to face the milkman with equanimity and never knows the guilt of buying something she can't able to face the milkman with equanimity and never knows the guilt of buying something she can't really afford. As for myself, I fall into neither of these categories. If l have money to spare I can be extravagant, but when, as is usually the case, I am hard up, then I am then meanest man imaginable. The word paradox means: