Home
Class 11
CHEMISTRY
Process (A) : F(2(g)) + 2e^(-) rarr 2F^(...

Process (A) : `F_(2(g)) + 2e^(-) rarr 2F^(-)_((g))` ,
Process (B) : `Cl_(2(g)) +2e^(-) rarr 2Cl_(g)^(-)`
which of these process is easy ? Why ?

Text Solution

Verified by Experts

`F_(2(g)) + 2e^(-) rarr 2F_((g))^(-)` is easy.
Though electron gain enthalpy of `Cl_((g))` to give `Cl_((g))^(-)` is more thab that of `F_((g))` to give `F_((g))^(-)` , the bond dissociation of `F_((2(g)))` is very less than that of `Cl_(2(g))`
Promotional Banner

Topper's Solved these Questions

  • PERIODIC TABLE

    AAKASH SERIES|Exercise SUBJECTIVE EXERCISE -1 (LONG ANSWER QUESTIONS)|9 Videos

  • PERIODIC TABLE

    AAKASH SERIES|Exercise SUBJECTIVE EXERCISE -1 (SHORT ANSWER QUESTIONS)|9 Videos

  • PERIODIC PROPERTIES

    AAKASH SERIES|Exercise LEVEL-II (TYPE -II) (PRACTICE SHEET -3 (SUBJECTIVE/ ANALYTICAL TYPE QUESTIONS ))|8 Videos

  • PURIFICATION OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND IUPAC NOMENCLATURE

    AAKASH SERIES|Exercise ADDITIONAL PRCATICE EXERCISE (LEVEL - II (LECTURE SHEET (ADVANCED) INTEGER TYPE QUESTIONS)|2 Videos

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

(A)F_(2)(g)+2e^(-)rarr2F^(-)(g),(B)Cl_(2)(g)+2e^(-)2Cl^(-)(g) . Which of these processes is easy? Why?

Among the reactions, F_(2(g)) + 2e^(-) to 2F_((g))^(-) and Cl_(2(g)) + 2e^(-) to 2Cl_((g))^(-) which is more feasible ? Give the reason.

For the process X_((g)) + e^(-) rarr X_((g))^(-), Delta H =x and X_(g)^(-) rarr X_(g) + e^(-) , Delta H = y Select correct alternat :

N_(2(g))+O_(2(g))rarr 2NO_(2(g))-Q is ……………..

Equal moles of F_(2(g)) and Cl_(2(g)) are introduced into a sealed container and heated to temperature T to attain the following equilibria. Cl_(2(g)) + F_(2(g)) hArr 2C//F_((g)) , Kp_(I)= 3.2 , Cl_(2(g)) + 3 F_(2(g)) hArr 2 CIF_(2(g)) , Kp_(2) . If partial pressures of CIF and CIF_(3) at equilibria are 0.2 and 0.04 atm respectively. What is the value of Kp_(2) ?

N_(2(g)) + 2O_(2(g)) rarr 2NO_(2) + xkJ, 2NO_((g)) + O_(2(g)) rarr 2NO_(2(g)) + ykJ . The enthalpy of formation of NO is