Assertion (A) Phenol forms 2, 4, 6-tribromophenol o treatment with `Br_(2)` in carbon disulphide at 273K.
Reason (R) Bromine polarises in carbon disulphide.
(a)Assertion and reason both are correct and reason is correct explanation of assertion.
(b)Assertion and reason both are wrong statements.
(c)Assertion is correct statement but reason is wrong statement.
(d)Assertion is wrong statement but reason is correct statement.

Options

A. Assertion and reason both are correct and reason is correct explanation of assertion.
B. Assertion and reason both are wrong statements.
C. Assertion is correct statement but reason is wrong statement.
D. Assertion is wrong statement but reason is correct statement.

Explanation

To solve the question, we need to analyze both the assertion and the reason provided.

### Step 1: Analyze the Assertion
The assertion states that phenol forms 2,4,6-tribromophenol when treated with bromine in carbon disulfide at 273 K.

- When phenol reacts with bromine, it can undergo electrophilic substitution.
- The positions where bromine can be substituted are ortho (2-position), meta (4-position), and para (6-position).
- However, the reaction typically leads to the formation of ortho and para products primarily, not directly to 2,4,6-tribromophenol unless excess bromine is used.
- Therefore, the assertion is **incorrect** because it implies that phenol directly forms 2,4,6-tribromophenol without specifying the need for excess bromine.

### Step 2: Analyze the Reason
The reason states that bromine polarizes in carbon disulfide.

- In carbon disulfide, bromine does not polarize significantly.
- Polarization refers to the ability of a molecule to develop a dipole moment in response to an electric field. Bromine in carbon disulfide does not exhibit this behavior effectively.
- Thus, the reason is also **incorrect**.

### Conclusion
Since both the assertion and the reason are incorrect, the correct answer is:
**(b) Assertion and reason both are wrong statements.**

---