Home
Class 11
CHEMISTRY
It 0.1 mole H3 POx is completely neutral...

It `0.1` mole `H_3 PO_x` is completely neutralised by `5.6g KOH` then select the true statement.

A

x=3 and given acid is dibasic

B

x=4 and given acid has no P-H linkage

C

x=2 and given acid does not form acid salt

D

all of the above

Text Solution

AI Generated Solution

The correct Answer is:
To solve the problem, we will follow these steps: ### Step 1: Calculate the number of moles of KOH To find the number of moles of KOH, we use the formula: \[ \text{Number of moles} = \frac{\text{mass (g)}}{\text{molar mass (g/mol)}} \] Given: - Mass of KOH = 5.6 g - Molar mass of KOH = 56 g/mol Calculating the moles of KOH: \[ \text{Number of moles of KOH} = \frac{5.6 \, \text{g}}{56 \, \text{g/mol}} = 0.1 \, \text{moles} \] ### Step 2: Determine the relationship between moles of acid and base We know that the neutralization reaction between an acid and a base follows the stoichiometry of the reaction. We have 0.1 moles of \( H_3PO_x \) and 0.1 moles of KOH. ### Step 3: Analyze the possible values of x We need to determine the possible values of x in \( H_3PO_x \) that can react with KOH in a 1:1 ratio. 1. **For \( H_3PO_4 \)**: - Reaction: \( H_3PO_4 + 3 KOH \rightarrow K_3PO_4 + 3 H_2O \) - Here, 1 mole of \( H_3PO_4 \) requires 3 moles of KOH. Therefore, 0.1 moles of \( H_3PO_4 \) would require 0.3 moles of KOH. This does not match our condition. 2. **For \( H_3PO_3 \)**: - Reaction: \( H_3PO_3 + 2 KOH \rightarrow K_2HPO_3 + 2 H_2O \) - Here, 1 mole of \( H_3PO_3 \) requires 2 moles of KOH. Therefore, 0.1 moles of \( H_3PO_3 \) would require 0.2 moles of KOH. This does not match our condition. 3. **For \( H_3PO_2 \)**: - Reaction: \( H_3PO_2 + KOH \rightarrow KH_2PO_2 + H_2O \) - Here, 1 mole of \( H_3PO_2 \) requires 1 mole of KOH. Therefore, 0.1 moles of \( H_3PO_2 \) would require 0.1 moles of KOH. This matches our condition. ### Conclusion The only value of x that satisfies the condition of complete neutralization with 5.6 g of KOH is when \( x = 2 \). Thus, the true statement is that \( H_3PO_x \) is \( H_3PO_2 \). ---
Promotional Banner

Similar Questions

Explore conceptually related problems

If 0.1 mole H_(3)PO_(x) is completely neutralised by 5.6g KOH then select the true statement.

0.01 mole H_(3)PO_(x) is completely neutralised by 0.56 gram of KOH hence :

1 mole of H_(2)SO_(4) will exactly neutralise:

Which of the following statements is/are true if 1 mol of H_(3)PO_(x) is completely neutralized by 40g of NaOH?

An aqueous solution of 6.3 g of oxalic acid dihydrate is made upto 250 mL. The volume of 0.1 N NaOH required to completely neutralise 10 mL of this solution is :

0.62 g Na_2 CO_3. xH_2 O completely neutralises 100 ml of N/10 H_2 SO_4 . The value of x must be:

2.0 g of an elements is reacted with aqueous solution containing KOH and KNO_(3) to yield K_(2)XO_(2) and NH_(3).NH_(3) thus liberated is absorbed in 200 " mL of " 0.05 M H_(2)SO_(4) . The excess acid required 10 " mL of " 1.5 M NaOH for complete neutralisation Which of the following statements is/are correct?

0.2 g of a monobasic acid gave 0.5 g of CO_2 and 0.089 g of H_2 O . 0.122 g of the same acid requires 10 mL of 0.1 N NaOH for complete neutralisation. Determine the molecular formula of the compound.

Statement 1 : If -2h=a+b , then one line of the pair of lines a x^2+2h x y+b y^2=0 bisects the angle between the coordinate axes in the positive quadrant. Statement 2 : If a x+y(2h+a)=0 is a factor of a x^2+2h x y+b y^2=0, then b+2h+a=0 Both the statements are true but statement 2 is the correct explanation of statement 1. Both the statements are true but statement 2 is not the correct explanation of statement 1. Statement 1 is true and statement 2 is false. Statement 1 is false and statement 2 is true.

Statement 1 : If -h2=a+b , then one line of the pair of lines a x^2+2h x y+b y^2=0 bisects the angle between the coordinate axes in the positive quadrant. Statement 2 : If a x+y(2h+a)=0 is a factor of a x^2+2h x y+b y^2=0, then b+2h+a=0 Both the statements are true but statement 2 is the correct explanation of statement 1. Both the statements are true but statement 2 is not the correct explanation of statement 1. Statement 1 is true and statement 2 is false. Statement 1 is false and statement 2 is true.