Assertion : Elimination of a competitively inferior species in a closely related or otherwise similar group is known as competitive exclusion principle.
Reason : If two species compete for the same resource, they could aviod competition by choosing different times for feeding or different foraging patterns.

Explanation

To solve the assertion-reason question, we need to analyze both the assertion and the reason provided.

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Assertion**:
- The assertion states that the elimination of a competitively inferior species in a closely related or similar group is known as the competitive exclusion principle.
- This principle, formulated by Gause, suggests that two species competing for the same limited resources cannot coexist indefinitely. One species will outcompete the other, leading to the elimination of the less efficient species.

2. **Understanding the Reason**:
- The reason provided states that if two species compete for the same resource, they could avoid competition by choosing different times for feeding or different foraging patterns.
- This statement highlights a concept known as resource partitioning, where species can coexist by utilizing resources in different ways or at different times, thus reducing direct competition.

3. **Evaluating the Correctness**:
- Both the assertion and the reason are correct statements. The assertion correctly describes the competitive exclusion principle, while the reason describes an alternative outcome of competition (resource partitioning) that can occur under certain circumstances.

4. **Determining the Relationship**:
- While both statements are correct, the reason does not explain the assertion. Instead, it presents a different perspective on competition. The assertion focuses on the outcome of competitive exclusion, while the reason discusses a strategy that species might employ to coexist.

5. **Conclusion**:
- Since both statements are correct but do not support each other, the correct answer is that both the assertion and reason are true, but the reason does not explain the assertion.

### Final Answer:
Both the assertion and reason are correct, but the reason does not explain the assertion.

---