Assertion : The radio and TV signals from broadcasting stations carry energy.
Reason : Electromagnetic waves are capable to carry energy from one place to another.

Options

A. If both assertion and reason are true and reason is the correct explanation of assertion
B. If both assertion and reason are true but reason is not the correct explanation of assertion
C. If assertion is true but reason is false
D. If both assertion and reason are false

Explanation

To solve the question regarding the assertion and reason provided, we will analyze both statements step by step.

### Step 1: Understanding the Assertion
- **Assertion**: The radio and TV signals from broadcasting stations carry energy.
- **Analysis**: Radio and TV signals are indeed forms of electromagnetic waves. These waves are capable of transmitting energy through space.

### Step 2: Understanding the Reason
- **Reason**: Electromagnetic waves are capable of carrying energy from one place to another.
- **Analysis**: This statement is true. Electromagnetic waves, including radio and TV signals, carry energy as they propagate through space. The energy carried by electromagnetic waves can be quantified using the formula \( E = h \nu \) (where \( E \) is energy, \( h \) is Planck's constant, and \( \nu \) is the frequency of the wave).

### Step 3: Relationship Between Assertion and Reason
- Since both the assertion and the reason are true, we need to determine if the reason provides a correct explanation for the assertion.
- The reason explains that electromagnetic waves are capable of carrying energy, which directly supports the assertion that radio and TV signals (which are types of electromagnetic waves) carry energy.

### Conclusion
- Both the assertion and the reason are true, and the reason is a correct explanation of the assertion.

### Final Answer
- Therefore, the correct option is that both the assertion and reason are true, and the reason is the correct explanation of the assertion.

---