Assertion : Sulphide ores are converted to oxides before reduction.
Reason : Oxides are easier to reduce.

Options

A. If both assertion and reason are true and reason is the correct explanation of assertion .
B. if both assertion and reason are true but reason is not the correct explanation of assertion
C. If assertion is true but reason is false
D. If both assertion and reason are false.

Answer

To solve the question regarding the assertion and reason provided, we can follow these steps:

### Step 1: Understand the Assertion
The assertion states that "sulphide ores are converted to oxides before reduction." This is a true statement in the context of metallurgy.

### Step 2: Explain the Process
The conversion of sulphide ores to oxides is typically achieved through a process called roasting. During roasting, sulphide ores are heated in the presence of oxygen, which leads to the formation of metal oxides and the release of sulfur dioxide gas.

### Step 3: Understand the Reason
The reason given is that "oxides are easier to reduce." This statement is also true. Metal oxides can be reduced more easily than their sulphide counterparts.

### Step 4: Connect Assertion and Reason
The reason explains why the assertion is true. Sulphide ores are converted to oxides because the reduction of metal oxides is more feasible and efficient in metallurgical processes.

### Step 5: Conclusion
Both the assertion and reason are correct, and the reason provided correctly explains the assertion. Therefore, the answer to the question is that both the assertion and reason are true and the reason correctly explains the assertion.

### Final Answer
Both the assertion and reason are correct, and the reason is a correct explanation of the assertion.

---