Taxonomy without phylogeny is similar to bones without flesh is the statement of

Options

A. Oswald Tippo
B. Takhtajan
C. Hutchison
D. Bentham and Hooker

Answer

### Step-by-Step Solution:

1. **Understanding the Statement**: The statement "Taxonomy without phylogeny is similar to bones without flesh" implies that taxonomy (the classification of organisms) needs to be supported by phylogeny (the evolutionary relationships among organisms) to be meaningful and complete.

2. **Identifying the Author**: The question asks who made this statement. We need to look at the options provided: Oswald, Tipo, Tectagen, Hutchinson, and Bentham and Hooker.

3. **Analyzing the Options**:
- **Oswald**: An American botanist known for modern classification of the plant kingdom, but not related to the statement.
- **Tipo**: There is no significant contribution related to the statement in the context of taxonomy and phylogeny.
- **Tectagen**: This is the correct option. Tectagen is known for making the statement about taxonomy and phylogeny.
- **Hutchinson**: An American geologist known for his work in ecology, not related to the statement.
- **Bentham and Hooker**: They contributed to the natural system of classification but did not make the statement in question.

4. **Conclusion**: Based on the analysis, the correct answer is **Tectagen**.

### Final Answer:
The statement "Taxonomy without phylogeny is similar to bones without flesh" is attributed to **Tectagen**.

---